Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moving _pb_timestamp_to_datetime into core. #1361

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2016

Conversation

dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

@dhermes dhermes commented Jan 7, 2016

This is in advance of v1beta3, where it will be needed to parse Value.timestamp_value (which is of type timestamp_pb2.Timestamp). Also adding _datetime_to_pb_timestamp for the other direction.


NOTE: Has #1353 as diffbase.

@dhermes dhermes added api: datastore Issues related to the Datastore API. api: core api: bigtable Issues related to the Bigtable API. labels Jan 7, 2016
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Jan 7, 2016
@dhermes dhermes mentioned this pull request Jan 7, 2016
49 tasks
@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jan 14, 2016

Rather than copying the generated files into our own package here, it might be good to generate all the proto-based files for BigTable in a separate package, and just import them like the ones from protobuf and googleapis-common-protos.

@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor Author

dhermes commented Jan 14, 2016

I agree and it's something that's been discussed with @tbetbetbe but I don't think it's worth blocking this PR. WDYT?

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jan 14, 2016

I'm actually thinking it would be better than what I proposed in #1317: if we could work out generating releasing the Python code from the protos as a separate project, we would simplify our own bits here, and maybe get to piggyback stuff like the Makefile in googleapis (note that it doesn't seem to support Python, so I'm not sure how they are generating googleapis-common-protos).

@dhermes dhermes force-pushed the move-_pb_timestamp_to_datetime branch 2 times, most recently from be6e3bb to e0f0c60 Compare January 14, 2016 23:24
This is in advance of `v1beta3`, where it will be needed
to parse `Value.timestamp_value` (which is of type
`timestamp_pb2.Timestamp`). Also adding `_datetime_to_pb_timestamp`
for the other direction.
@dhermes dhermes force-pushed the move-_pb_timestamp_to_datetime branch from e0f0c60 to d3058f3 Compare January 15, 2016 02:28
@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor Author

dhermes commented Jan 15, 2016

@tseaver PTAL, I rebased after #1353

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jan 15, 2016

LGTM

dhermes added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2016
Moving _pb_timestamp_to_datetime into core.
@dhermes dhermes merged commit 1e70cbf into googleapis:master Jan 15, 2016
@dhermes dhermes deleted the move-_pb_timestamp_to_datetime branch January 15, 2016 04:54
atulep pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2023
…les#1361)

* add transcribe_model_selection

* add transcribe_model_selection_test

* flake
atulep pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2023
…les#1361)

* add transcribe_model_selection

* add transcribe_model_selection_test

* flake
atulep pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2023
…les#1361)

* add transcribe_model_selection

* add transcribe_model_selection_test

* flake
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2023
…les#1361)

* add transcribe_model_selection

* add transcribe_model_selection_test

* flake
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: bigtable Issues related to the Bigtable API. api: core api: datastore Issues related to the Datastore API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants