Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reducing the memory footprint of active series custom trackers #2568
Reducing the memory footprint of active series custom trackers #2568
Changes from 2 commits
40bb6e7
3067b74
757f228
72ad043
10c353c
b152483
7cf417b
ccccfd5
d0cb574
779d0a8
f460b60
da93b2f
5693061
26a4d6c
9def4f3
e2074d3
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we see benchmarks of this? :)
This will have to allocate a new slice every
2^n
matchers, which is probably more expensive than just allocating a slice of bools since it will push unnecessary pressure on the GC.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we're worried about memory consumption here, then IMO we should keep the previous approach and change
[]bool
to a bitarray backed by[]uint64