-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 512
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Mimir Prometheus to baf7468
#8029
Conversation
The whole list of changes is included as part of Mimir Prometheus PR in grafana/mimir-prometheus#622 I don't think there's any change that's worth mentioning, given that they aren't user-facing but do let me know if you think there's something worth adding to the changelog. Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. I've reviewed mimir-prometheus changes, and checked protobuf release note (I can't see anything suspicious there).
I'm investigating the CI failure as is very relevant to the CI changes - looks like it's failing to execute the restoration because it does not return any samples when querying the |
Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com>
ee1b0be
ee1b0be
~~ 352c7ff
ee1b0be
~~ 352c7ff
352c7ff
352c7ff
352c7ff
Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com>
* [BUGFIX] querier: Don't cache context.Canceled errors for bucket index. #7620 | ||
* [BUGFIX] Querier: Don't cache context.Canceled errors for bucket index. #7620 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is a typo all the others are capitalised.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's OK editing it, but we're not very strict with the CHANGELOG. Anyway, it's good you improved it.
The CI failures are real; they relate to prometheus/prometheus#14047, which is going to be shortly merged. What are my options here? I could technically fix it in mimir-Prometheus very quickly and re-import or just wait? I'd like this PR to be merged today so that this gets rolled out next week 😭 |
It looks like that PR will indeed be merged shortly. I'd suggest to wait for it and if it's not merged by monday, do the fix in mimir-prometheus. We can update our weekly release after it's been cut. |
Looks like that PR is blocking your work, I'm just going to add the missing test case to the contributor's PR. Do you want to add a review over there? :) |
Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com>
352c7ff
baf7468
What this PR does
The whole list of changes is included as part of Mimir Prometheus PR in grafana/mimir-prometheus#622, grafana/mimir-prometheus#623 and grafana/mimir-prometheus#625
I don't think there's any change that's worth mentioning, given that they aren't user-facing but do let me know if you think there's something worth adding to the changelog.As part of the second
mimir-prometheus
PR there is a change that I have noted in the changelog. Matrix results were returningnull
instead of[]
in some cases.I have managed to reproduce this by running:
Against a querier in both
main
and thisbranch
.Which issue(s) this PR fixes or relates to
Related to https://github.com/grafana/mimir-squad/issues/1845
Checklist
CHANGELOG.md
updated - the order of entries should be[CHANGE]
,[FEATURE]
,[ENHANCEMENT]
,[BUGFIX]
.about-versioning.md
updated with experimental features.