feat: Update ConsensusUpdateTopicHandler with new custom fee functionality

[vtronkov]

Description:

Related issue(s):

Fixes #15513

Notes for reviewer:

Checklist

• Documented (Code comments, README, etc.)
• Tested (unit, integration, etc.)

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	✅ 44.26%

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (c339784)	108899	67081	61.60%
Head commit (d204248)	108940 (+41)	67105 (+24)	61.60% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#15539)	61	27	44.26%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 31.14754% with 42 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 58.05%. Comparing base (c339784) to head (d204248).
Report is 1 commits behind head on hip-991-topic-fees-create.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...sus/impl/handlers/ConsensusUpdateTopicHandler.java	30.35%	32 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
.../impl/validators/ConsensusCustomFeesValidator.java	33.33%	2 Missing ⚠️
...sus/impl/handlers/ConsensusCreateTopicHandler.java	50.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                       Coverage Diff                       @@
##             hip-991-topic-fees-create   #15539      +/-   ##
===============================================================
- Coverage                        58.05%   58.05%   -0.01%     
- Complexity                       21535    21546      +11     
===============================================================
  Files                             2776     2776              
  Lines                           109082   109123      +41     
  Branches                         11188    11198      +10     
===============================================================
+ Hits                             63326    63346      +20     
- Misses                           41891    41908      +17     
- Partials                          3865     3869       +4     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...java/com/hedera/node/config/data/TopicsConfig.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...sus/impl/handlers/ConsensusCreateTopicHandler.java	78.40% <50.00%> (+12.50%)	⬆️
.../impl/validators/ConsensusCustomFeesValidator.java	60.00% <33.33%> (+53.10%)	⬆️
...sus/impl/handlers/ConsensusUpdateTopicHandler.java	50.00% <30.35%> (-14.40%)	⬇️

... and 22 files with indirect coverage changes

[vtronkov]

Since the change here the builder is one to one to the topic. There is no need to copy over the values again. Also, I changed the resolvedUpdateMetaFrom method(called below) to expect ExpiryMeta instead of Topic and build the ExpiryMeta before the call. That way we don't need to pass Topic

[vtronkov]

I deleted this method because the resolvedUpdateMetaFrom method is called twice in the handle - once from validateMaybeNewAttributes.validateMaybeNewExpiry and once from resolveMutableBuilderAttributes