Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 16, 2021. It is now read-only.

Standardized Readme, Add LICENSE #53

Merged
2 commits merged into from
Sep 8, 2016
Merged

Standardized Readme, Add LICENSE #53

2 commits merged into from
Sep 8, 2016

Conversation

RichardLitt
Copy link
Contributor

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
The MIT License (MIT)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should probably license articles included in this repo too.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CC @jbenet

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't MIT just for software?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is, so for now we can say that articles are all rights reserved, but I don't know how it would work with people contributing to blog posts.

@RichardLitt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is there another open source license? CC? ISC?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 8, 2016

The website's footer states everything is CC-BY 3.0 -- we should make the blog code MIT, and all content CC-BY.

© Protocol Labs | Except as noted, content licensed CC-BY 3.0.

@RichardLitt RichardLitt self-assigned this Jul 8, 2016
@RichardLitt
Copy link
Contributor Author

How does that look?

@RichardLitt RichardLitt removed their assignment Jul 27, 2016
@RichardLitt RichardLitt assigned ghost Sep 1, 2016
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 8, 2016

LGTM 👍

@ghost ghost merged commit b8a0bb9 into master Sep 8, 2016
@ghost ghost deleted the feature/standardize-readme branch September 8, 2016 15:23
@ghost ghost removed the meta label Sep 8, 2016
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants