-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Integrate company-ghc into ghc-mod #7
Comments
Hi, Since company-ghc depends on ghc-mod elisp internal, I think it is better to integrate it into ghc-mod. (it can be easily broken by ghc-mod change) I have several concerns (rather random thoughts) though.
I'd like to hear comments on the above from ghc-mod maintainers. Thanks. |
From: Iku Iwasa notifications@github.com
Yeah, that's one of the reasons I'd like to merge it :)
I for one prefer GPL3+ over ghc-mod's current license but I'm not the
You can simply fork ghc-mod and work on your changes is a branch and
Cask/ecukes look really cool actually I was looking for something to
I'm one of the co-maintainers. @kazu-yamamoto, the original author and
Awesome :) |
GNU thinks BSD is compatible with GPL. So, changing license from Note that GPL is not compatible with BSD. So, changing license |
From: Kazu Yamamoto notifications@github.com
I don't quite understand what you mean by "changing license from GHC
That's not quite true. We don't have to change the license of the code Therefore there is no license compatibility problem. If anyone wants I for one would like my contributions (at least those concerning |
About license, it is OK for me either to change it to BSD3 or to remain GPLv3.
OK, it's fine.
My Cask knowledge is very limited (just to prepare simple Cask file), but I am willing to help if any. |
Please do s/GHC/GPL/ in my comment. |
BSD license allows to distribute the code without its source code opened but GPL prohibits that. I don't think it will be a real problem for ghc-mod. But it is a common real problem of GPL. |
Let's continue the GPL vs BSD holy wars somewhere else ;) |
I can accept the situation where each file has its own license. But how to implement it? Should each file include its license in the end of the file? |
@iquiw If you wish, I would give access right to the ghc-mod repository. |
@kazu-yamamoto I will request it if the need comes.Thank you. |
Hey,
this looks really awesome, adding a company backend for ghc-mod has been on my TODO list for ages now, looks like you did it better than I could have if i tried ;) I'm one of the maintainers of ghc-mod and I was wondering if you might want this to be merged into ghc-mod itself? We're about to do some major elisp code cleanup so this might be just the right time to do it if you want to.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: