Replace loopvar linter

[anishbista60]

Which problem is this PR solving?

• Resolves Replace loopvar linter #5972

Description of the changes

• Changed the loopvar linter to copyloopvar.

How was this change tested?

Checklist

• I have read https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
• I have signed all commits
• I have added unit tests for the new functionality
• I have run lint and test steps successfully
  • for jaeger: make lint test
  • for jaeger-ui: yarn lint and yarn test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.81%. Comparing base (99f33a4) to head (fb4a720).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5976   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.81%   96.81%           
=======================================
  Files         345      345           
  Lines       16523    16523           
=======================================
  Hits        15996    15996           
  Misses        340      340           
  Partials      187      187           

Flag	Coverage Δ
badger_v1	8.02% <ø> (ø)
badger_v2	1.82% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v1	16.61% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2	1.75% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v1	16.61% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v2	1.75% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-6.x-v1	18.78% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-7.x-v1	18.84% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v1	19.02% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
elasticsearch-8.x-v2	1.82% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
grpc_v1	9.52% <ø> (ø)
grpc_v2	7.15% <ø> (ø)
kafka-v1	9.74% <ø> (ø)
kafka-v2	1.82% <ø> (ø)
memory_v2	1.82% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
opensearch-1.x-v1	18.88% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v1	18.88% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
opensearch-2.x-v2	1.82% <ø> (ø)
tailsampling-processor	0.46% <ø> (ø)
unittests	95.29% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[yurishkuro]

Thanks!