Jest globals differ from Node globals

[thomashuston]

Do you want to request a feature or report a bug?
Bug

What is the current behavior?
After making a request with Node's http package, checking if one of the response headers is an instanceof Array fails because the Array class used inside http seems to differ from the one available in Jest's VM.

I specifically came across this when trying to use node-fetch in Jest to verify that cookies are set on particular HTTP responses. The set-cookie header hits this condition and fails to pass in Jest https://github.com/bitinn/node-fetch/blob/master/lib/headers.js#L38

This sounds like the same behavior reported in #2048; re-opening per our discussion there.

If the current behavior is a bug, please provide the steps to reproduce and either a repl.it demo through https://repl.it/languages/jest or a minimal repository on GitHub that we can yarn install and yarn test.
https://github.com/thomas-huston-zocdoc/jest-fetch-array-bug

What is the expected behavior?
The global Array class instance in Jest should match that of Node's packages so type checks behave as expected.

I've submitted a PR to node-fetch switching from instanceof Array to Array.isArray to address the immediate issue, but the Jest behavior still seems unexpected and it took quite a while to track down.

Please provide your exact Jest configuration and mention your Jest, node, yarn/npm version and operating system.
I am using the default Jest configuration (I have not changed any settings in my package.json).
Jest - 18.1.0
Node - 6.9.1 (also tested in 4.7.0 and saw the same error)
npm - 3.10.8
OS - Mac OS X 10.11.6

[suchipi]

This is likely due to the behavior of vm; see nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#1277

Does Jest do anything to try to avoid this right now?

[PlasmaPower]

I came across the exact scenario. It's very hard to diagnose. I also came across it with Error objects. Writing wrapper workarounds for this is getting annoying.

From the linked nodejs issue:

Yes, Array.isArray() is the best way to test if something is an array.

However, Error.isError is not a function.

[suchipi]

Jest team- should the node (and maybe jsdom) environment(s) be changed to put things like Error, Array, etc from the running context into the vm context? I believe that would solve this issue.

Alternatively, maybe babel-jest could transform instanceof calls against global bindings such that they work across contexts.

[PlasmaPower]

I don't like the babel-jest idea, if something like that is implemented it should be its own plugin. Other than that, I agree.

[cpojer]

We can't pull in the data structures from the parent context because we want to sandbox every test. If you guys could enumerate the places where these foreign objects are coming from, we can wrap those places and emit the correct instances. For example, if setTimeout throws an error, then we can wrap that and re-throw with an Error from the vm context.

[suchipi]

Is there any risk to the sandboxing added other than "if someone messes with these objects directly, it will affect other tests"? Or is there something inherent in the way the contexts are set up that would make this dangerous passively? Just trying to understand. I'd guess that instanceof Error checks are more likely than Error.foo = "bar" type stuff.

[cpojer]

It's one of the guarantees of Jest that two tests cannot conflict with each other, so we cannot change it. The question is where you are getting your Error and Arrays from that are causing trouble.

[PlasmaPower]

They come from node native libraries like fs or http.

[cpojer]

Ah, hmm, that's a good point. It works for primitives but not that well for errors or arrays :(

[suchipi]

What if jest transformed instanceof Array and instanceof Error specifically into something like instanceof jest.__parentContextArray and instanceof jest.__parentContextError?

[cpojer]

meh, I'm not sure I love that :(

[suchipi]

We could override Symbol.hasInstance on the globals in the child context to also check their parent context if the first check fails... But Symbol.hasInstance only works in node 6.10.0+ or babel. Can't remember; does jest use babel everywhere by default?

[cpojer]

I'm ok if this feature only works in newer versions of node. It seems much cleaner to me; assuming it doesn't have negative performance implications.

[suchipi]

Assuming performance seems fine, which globals should it be applied to? Error and Array... Buffer maybe, too?

[cpojer]

Yeah, that sounds like a good start.

[suchipi]

I may be able to tackle a PR for this this weekend. I'm assuming we want it in both the node and jsdom environments?

[suchipi]

I've started work on this in https://github.com/suchipi/jest/tree/instanceof_overrides, but am having difficulty reproducing the original issue. @PlasmaPower or @thomashuston do you have a minimal repro I could test against?

[PlasmaPower]

@suchipi https://gist.github.com/PlasmaPower/4a59544f4e631e32515f927eef8a08a3

[joedynamite]

Not sure if it is 100% related or not but I have issues with exports not being considered Objects. For example the test in this gist will fail but if I run node index and log I get true: https://gist.github.com/joedynamite/b98494be21cd6d8ed0e328535c7df9d0

[PlasmaPower]

@joedynamite sounds like the same issue

[PlasmaPower]

Assuming performance seems fine, which globals should it be applied to? Error and Array... Buffer maybe, too?

Why not everything? I'm assuming performance won't be an issue as instanceof shouldn't be called often.

[jakeorr]

I ran into a related issue with Express+Supertest+Jest. The 'set-cookie' header comes in with all cookies in a single string rather than a string for each cookie. Here is a reproduction case with the output I'm seeing with Jest and with Mocha (it works with mocha): #3547 (comment)

[rexxars]

Just spent a couple of hours trying to figure out what happened when an app failed in weird ways because of an instanceof Error check.

Basically, http errors seem to not be instances of Error, which is very frustrating.

Very simple, reproducible test case here.

[kettanaito]

@kayahr, sorry for the confusion. Yes, my comment was an elaboration to the previously posted comment.

Afaik, Jest has moved away from meddling with globals in Node, so this original issue shouldn't be reproducible anymore (Jest remaps all present Node globals to the jest-environment-node automatically, nothing should be missing). jest-environment-jsdom does, however, still miss Node globals, to which I've commented.

[davidjb]

@kettanaito This issue is still present in the latest versions of Jest v29.7.0 and v30.0.0-alpha.3. https://github.com/thomas-huston-zocdoc/jest-fetch-array-bug is still reproducing the issue for Array (with Jest suitably upgraded). In my case, instanceof Error returns true under Node but still returns false under Jest.

[DScheglov]

Hey Jest Team,

Please ensure that instanceof Error works correctly under Jest. TypeScript now considers caught errors as unknown, so this check will become more popular than previously.

Do you have any suggestion how to "patch" this bug now without skipping test and code modification?

[brenc]

This is wild. Ran into this one today myself. err instanceof Error still doesn't work in Jest v29.7.0. I would think that having "testEnvironment": "node" in the config would be enough.

This is exactly why outside of this project I have always avoided Jest or any other testing framework that does weird stuff with globals or any other magical wonkiness (I typically use node-tap).

For those down the line who come here and don't want to read all the comments like I did, @kayahr's workaround worked for me (thanks!):

pnpm add -D jest-environment-node-single-context

Change Jest config:

"testEnvironment": "jest-environment-node-single-context",

[CMCDragonkai]

What about node's native testing now.

[Yona-Appletree]

I ran into this while switching to jest from mocha.

Our code uses iterator-helpers-polyfill for early access to the very helpful Iterator and AsyncIterator methods.

The polyfill patches Iterator and AsyncIterator, which work from app code, but iterators from within node don't get patched, which breaks things.

We are currently using jest-environment-node-single-context as a workaround, but it's not ideal.