Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 [backport release-0.5] Persist filters in URL for applications table (#2033) #2038

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 1, 2024

Conversation

rszwajko
Copy link
Collaborator

@rszwajko rszwajko commented Aug 1, 2024

Backport-of: (#2033)
Fix regression after: #1980
Resolves: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTA-1390

Initial filter values work best if the table is not persisting state between reloads (default strategy, component state). If the table uses session or local storage then any existing filter overwrites the default value. From the end user perspective the functionality works only on the first load with a clean browser (no previous state).

Switching to URL filter persistence provides the same functionality and ensures we have only one source of filters.

Reference-Url: #1698

Fix regression after: konveyor#1980
Resolves: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTA-1390

Initial filter values work best if the table is not persisting state
between reloads (default strategy, component state). If the table uses
session or local storage then any existing filter overwrites the default
value. From the end user perspective the functionality works only on the
first load with a clean browser (no previous state).

Switching to URL filter persistence provides the same functionality and
ensures we have only one source of filters.

Reference-Url:  konveyor#1698

Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Szwajkowski <rszwajko@redhat.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (release-0.5@0e579db). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##             release-0.5    #2038   +/-   ##
==============================================
  Coverage               ?   42.33%           
==============================================
  Files                  ?      172           
  Lines                  ?     5525           
  Branches               ?     1359           
==============================================
  Hits                   ?     2339           
  Misses                 ?     3170           
  Partials               ?       16           
Flag Coverage Δ
client 42.33% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sjd78 sjd78 merged commit 204f421 into konveyor:release-0.5 Aug 1, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants