-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rewrite remoteload_test integration tests #4783
Merged
k8s-ci-robot
merged 12 commits into
kubernetes-sigs:master
from
mightyguava:rewrite-integration-tests
Sep 19, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a249b04
Better error message when git clone fails
mightyguava ddc6825
support file:// URLs
mightyguava 185ec88
rewrite remoteload_test
mightyguava 1287caf
lint and test fix
mightyguava 74cc1c0
fixes for kverey's comments
mightyguava 775b7a1
document file:// remote load
mightyguava 0963a2a
replace assert with require where appropriate
mightyguava 3667068
add tests for file:// without git suffix
mightyguava 020fec9
fixes plus pr review from natasha
mightyguava 3217f9a
fixes for review, lint
mightyguava 4c0bf39
revert changes to error handling
mightyguava 215455c
fix skipped test
mightyguava File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I remember you mentioning in another PR that we should probably rename
RepoSpec.Host
toRepoSpec.SchemeHost
. I still think that's a good suggestion, and we can include it in this PR if you'd like.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I actually thought that it was a behavior change the previous PR or recent PR added. I was wrong. This seems like the
Host
hasn't meant that for a long time. So I'm actually more comfortable now with doing that in a separate PR haha. Thanks for calling it out and being so open about it though!