-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 238
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
apis/nfd: flatten the structure of features data type #925
apis/nfd: flatten the structure of features data type #925
Conversation
Flatten the data structure that stores features, dropping the "domain" level from the data model. That extra level of hierarchy brought little benefit but just caused some extra complexity, instead. The new structure nicely matches what we have in the NodeFeatureRule object (the matchFeatures field of uses the same flat structure with the "feature" field having a value <domain>.<feature>, e.g. "kernel.version"). This is pre-work for introducing a new "node feature" CRD that contains the raw feature data. It makes the life of both users and developers easier when both CRDs, plus our internal code, handle feature data in a similar flat structure.
Re-generate after the latest API change. Involves renaming the crd spec files.
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-nfd ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ArangoGutierrez, marquiz The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Flatten the data structure that stores features, dropping the "domain"
level from the data model. That extra level of hierarchy brought little
benefit but just caused some extra complexity, instead. The new
structure nicely matches what we have in the NodeFeatureRule object (the
matchFeatures field of uses the same flat structure with the "feature"
field having a value
<domain>.<feature>
, e.g.kernel.version
).This is pre-work for introducing a new "node feature" CRD that contains
the raw feature data. It makes the life of both users and developers
easier when both CRDs, plus our internal code, handle feature data in a
similar flat structure.
Split out from #903