Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add 198.51.100.0/24 to non-masq ranges. #77844

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2019
Merged

Add 198.51.100.0/24 to non-masq ranges. #77844

merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2019

Conversation

grayluck
Copy link
Contributor

Adding 198.51.100.0/24 to non-masq rules which was missing in the previous PR.

The previous PR: #77458

/kind feature
/kind bug

Special notes for your reviewer:
/assign bowei

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels May 14, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @grayluck. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label May 14, 2019
@grayluck
Copy link
Contributor Author

/sig network
/priority important-soon

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels May 14, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. label May 14, 2019
@yue9944882
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 14, 2019
@bowei
Copy link
Member

bowei commented May 14, 2019

can we group these by RFC

@grayluck
Copy link
Contributor Author

grayluck commented May 14, 2019 •
edited
Loading

can we group these by RFC

It's currently in the order of IP section of the CIDRs, with local traffic at top, which to me is more natural and easier to seek for. But I am open at this.

@grayluck
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@grayluck
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold
Need a new IP masq agent build.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 14, 2019
@grayluck
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel
Tested: ip masq agent get deployed with:
-A IP-MASQ -d 198.51.100.0/24 -m comment --comment "ip-masq-agent: local traffic is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 15, 2019
@grayluck
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-kubernetes-integration

@grayluck
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-kubernetes-integration

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 15, 2019
@grayluck
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-kubernetes-verify

@grayluck
Add 198.51.100.0/24 to non-masq ranges.
14015d9 
Groupped the IP ranges by RFC and type.

Change reference for 198.18.0.0/15 from RFC 2544 to RFC 6815.
@grayluck
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@bowei
Copy link
Member

bowei commented May 16, 2019

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 16, 2019
@bowei
Copy link
Member

bowei commented May 16, 2019

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bowei, grayluck

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 16, 2019
@grayluck
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for review and comments, Bowei!

@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

3 similar comments
@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit af692da into kubernetes:master May 17, 2019
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bowei bowei bowei left review comments

@gmarek gmarek Awaiting requested review from gmarek

@yujuhong yujuhong Awaiting requested review from yujuhong

Assignees

@bowei bowei

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@grayluck @k8s-ci-robot @yue9944882 @bowei @fejta-bot