[WIP Waiting for Source Code Merge] Bring StorageObjectInUseProtection feature to GA #7775
Conversation
pospispa
commented
Mar 18, 2018
pospispa
commented
* Fix partition value expected behaviour explanation (kubernetes#7123) Fixes issue kubernetes#7057 * Correct "On-Premise" to "On-Premises" * Updates the Calico installation page (kubernetes#7094) * All files for Haufe Groups case study (kubernetes#7051) * Fix typo (kubernetes#7127) * fix typo of device-plugins.md (kubernetes#7106) * fix broken links (kubernetes#7136) * Updated configure-service-account (kubernetes#7147) Error from server resolved by escaping kubectl patch serviceaccount default -p '{"imagePullSecrets": [{"name": "myregistrykey"}]}' JSON string by '\'
With kubernetes/kubernetes#58367 merged, v1.10 will not use the "require-kubeconfig" flag. The flag has become a no-op solely to ensure existing deployments won't break.
…State (kubernetes#7164) The below PR: kubernetes/kubernetes#55873 modified scheduler in such a way that scheduling of a pod that uses a PVC in Terminating state fails. That's why verification of such scenario was added to documentation.
…s#7140) With kubernetes/kubernetes#58978 merged, the said feature gate is removed. This PR removes texts related to the gate and revises the Feature Gates reference to reflect this change.
The `Accelerators` feature gate will be removed in 1.11. 1.10 will be its last mile. References: kubernetes/kubernetes#57384
The `HugePages` feature gate has graduated to Beta in v1.10. This PR documents this fact.
* Kms provider doc * issue# 7399, Create KMS-provider.md and update encrypt-data.md * address review comments
* Add docs for CRD features for 1.10 * Add CustomResourcesSubresources to list of feature gates * Add latest changes to custom resources doc
* Bring PVC Protection Feature to Beta The PR: kubernetes/kubernetes#59052 brought PVC Protection feature to beta. That's why the documentation is updated accordingly. * The PVC Protection feature was renamed to Storage Protection. That's why the documentation is updated.
…etes#7134) * promote PodNodeSelector to stable; document detailed behavior * respond to feedback
With `CPUManager` feature graduating to beta. No explicit enabling is required starting v1.10. References: kubernetes/kubernetes#55977
…7531) Code review comments. Changed property to field. Address tech review comment.
--show-all has been deprecated and set to true by default. kubernetes/kubernetes#60210
s/envrionment/environment
s/simultanously/simultaneously/
s/slighty/slightly/
s/threshhold/threshold
s/achive/achieve
s/compatability/compatibility/
k8s-ci-robot
requested review from
caesarxuchao,
ConnorDoyle,
davidopp,
deads2k,
derekwaynecarr,
DirectXMan12,
enisoc,
erictune,
errordeveloper,
jcbsmpsn,
jessfraz and
jsafrane
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Assign the PR to them by writing The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
size/XXL
|
/hold |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
do-not-merge/hold
|
Deploy preview for kubernetes-io-master-staging ready! Built with commit eee4f5c https://deploy-preview-7775--kubernetes-io-master-staging.netlify.com |
StorageObjectInUseProtection is Beta in K8s 1.10. It's brought to GA in K8s 1.11.
pospispa
force-pushed
the
Bring-StorageObjectInUseProtection-feature-to-GA
branch
from
f35b1fd
to
eee4f5c
Compare
|
/assign @pospispa can you please do the rebase to |
|
This PR is for K8s 1.11. So I better close it create it once again later. |
|
@pospispa whoops, sorry, did not see that. The release team is a bit hypervigilant on this feature atm. Although yeah even late at night I should have remembered that you're in beta for 1.10. I can let you know as soon as the |
