Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move definition of flx-ido-mode to appease byte-compiler #80

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 30, 2015
Merged

Move definition of flx-ido-mode to appease byte-compiler #80

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 30, 2015

Conversation

tarsius
Copy link
Contributor

@tarsius tarsius commented Oct 30, 2015

Also add file "misc/.nosearch" to prevent "misc/" from being added to the load-path.

This prevent that the directory "misc/" is added to the `load-path'.
@PythonNut
Copy link
Collaborator

Not sure if I have the authority to merge this.

@lewang would this make 0.6.1?

@lewang
Copy link
Owner

lewang commented Oct 30, 2015

My ideas around release management and the various package managers being used is lacking. If we just merged this into master, and changed the version to something alpha here would that work?

@lewang
Copy link
Owner

lewang commented Oct 30, 2015

And manage release through git tags?

@PythonNut
Copy link
Collaborator

At the moment, we don't have any sort of channel-based release system.

In any case, I would consider this a "hotfix" (like dd4b4d5, it fixes stuff that's critically broken for some), which should probably go straight to some sort of release.

I'd suggest just merging it and tagging 0.6.1

lewang added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2015
Move definition of flx-ido-mode to appease byte-compiler
@lewang lewang merged commit b96f2c3 into lewang:master Oct 30, 2015
@tarsius
Copy link
Contributor Author

tarsius commented Oct 30, 2015

Thanks

@tarsius tarsius deleted the silencio branch October 30, 2015 18:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants