Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a handler to control PLI sending rate #788

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 3, 2017

Conversation

jcague
Copy link
Contributor

@jcague jcague commented Mar 3, 2017

Description

Here we stop sending too many PLIs when multiple clients are subscribed to one publisher. It will also send a FIR packet after waiting too long for keyframes.

  • It needs and includes Unit Tests

Changes in Client or Server public APIs

Not needed.

[] It includes documentation for these changes in /doc.

Copy link
Contributor

@lodoyun lodoyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Nice! Just a naming convention thing.

@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include "rtp/LayerDetectorHandler.h"
#include "rtp/QualityFilterHandler.h"
#include "rtp/QualityManager.h"
#include "rtp/PLIPacerHandler.h"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've been using camelcase also for abbreviations lately (NackGenerator). I don't have an strong opinion on what's better but we should be consistent

std::shared_ptr<dataPacket> RtpUtils::createPLI(uint32_t source_ssrc, uint32_t sink_ssrc) {
RtcpHeader pli;
pli.setPacketType(RTCP_PS_Feedback_PT);
pli.setBlockCount(1);
pli.setBlockCount(RTCP_PLI_FMT);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@jcague jcague merged commit f38a596 into lynckia:master Mar 3, 2017
@jcague jcague deleted the add/pli_pacing branch March 3, 2017 13:25
Arri98 pushed a commit to Arri98/licode that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants