We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The following commands generate an <mi> for each letter of the text, instead of a single <mi>, which is semantically better.
\injlim \projlim \varinjlim \varliminf \varlimsup \varprojlim
The test pages are: LaTeXToMathML/limits-2.html LaTeXToMathML/limits-2-ref.html
This gives incorrect spacing in Firefox: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320294 (fixed in Firefox 13)
Also, MathPlayer reads it "I N J L I M". The reference is read a bit better, although not entirely correct: "In J Limit" .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Make \injlim and friends produce single <mi> elements for thier names…
6e73b80
…. Resolves issue mathjax#215.
The issue215 branch of my fork of MathJax should resolve this.
issue215
Sorry, something went wrong.
OK, I verified the fixed on Chrome, Opera and Firefox and updated the test.
=> Ready for release
No branches or pull requests
The following commands generate an <mi> for each letter of the text, instead of a single <mi>, which is semantically better.
\injlim
\projlim
\varinjlim
\varliminf
\varlimsup
\varprojlim
The test pages are:
LaTeXToMathML/limits-2.html
LaTeXToMathML/limits-2-ref.html
This gives incorrect spacing in Firefox:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320294 (fixed in Firefox 13)
Also, MathPlayer reads it "I N J L I M". The reference is read a bit better, although not entirely correct: "In J Limit" .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: