feat: admin APIs for token authenticated registration

[santhoshivan23]

Pull Request Checklist

• I have added Go unit tests or Complement integration tests for this PR or I have justified why this PR doesn't need tests
• Pull request includes a sign off below using a legally identifiable name or I have already signed off privately

Signed-off-by: Santhoshivan Amudhan santhoshivan23@gmail.com

[S7evinK]

As there are no tests in Sytest, would be awesome if you could add tests for this in Dendrite. :)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 75.75% and project coverage change: +0.11 🎉

Comparison is base (a734b11) 65.54% compared to head (04ca62a) 65.65%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3101      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.54%   65.65%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         502      504       +2     
  Lines       55192    55753     +561     
==========================================
+ Hits        36174    36604     +430     
- Misses      15256    15356     +100     
- Partials     3762     3793      +31     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	49.96% <75.75%> (+0.32%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
userapi/api/api.go	70.90% <ø> (ø)
userapi/storage/postgres/storage.go	50.35% <40.00%> (-0.39%)	⬇️
userapi/storage/sqlite3/storage.go	50.35% <40.00%> (-0.39%)	⬇️
clientapi/routing/admin.go	62.97% <68.22%> (+5.35%)	⬆️
userapi/internal/user_api.go	64.80% <71.42%> (+0.19%)	⬆️
clientapi/routing/routing.go	64.66% <73.91%> (+0.20%)	⬆️
...rapi/storage/postgres/registration_tokens_table.go	81.34% <81.34%> (ø)
...erapi/storage/sqlite3/registration_tokens_table.go	81.34% <81.34%> (ø)
setup/config/config_clientapi.go	73.68% <100.00%> (+0.46%)	⬆️
userapi/storage/shared/storage.go	78.22% <100.00%> (+0.87%)	⬆️

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[S7evinK]

Needs a few changes, but this is promising :)

Comments for Postgres should also apply to SQLite.
As for the database functions, there is a bit of inconsistency here: Sometimes you're using sqlutil.TxStmt() and sometimes you're using the "raw" statement.

[santhoshivan23]

Needs a few changes, but this is promising :)

Comments for Postgres should also apply to SQLite. As for the database functions, there is a bit of inconsistency here: Sometimes you're using sqlutil.TxStmt() and sometimes you're using the "raw" statement.

Thanks @S7evinK - let me work on the comments

[santhoshivan23]

@S7evinK Thanks for your valuable comments. I've addressed all of them

[santhoshivan23]

@S7evinK PR is ready for review!

[S7evinK]

Didn't have a look at the tests yet, doing that tomorrow.

[santhoshivan23]

@S7evinK - addressed all the comments.

[devonh]

I added 2 comments about flipping logic around. Otherwise, once the linter errors are fixed this should be good to merge.

[santhoshivan23]

thanks @devonh @S7evinK for the review. i've addressed the comments. hope we can merge this now