Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dynamic corelib.net loading #2762

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 19, 2021
Merged

Conversation

fhnaseer
Copy link
Member

No description provided.


foreach(var file in files.Skip(1))
cancellationToken.ThrowIfCancellationRequested();

Copy link
Member

@jakubch1 jakubch1 Feb 19, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe add comment why we are invoking it dynamically.
Also add try catch block inside this method or when you call MergeCodeCoverageFilesAsync. Make sure we return original attachments in case of error

@jakubch1 jakubch1 merged commit 34fa5b5 into master Feb 19, 2021
@jakubch1 jakubch1 deleted the dev/faisalhafeez/DynamicCoreLibLoading branch February 19, 2021 23:01
fhnaseer added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2021
* First working version,

* Calling async method,

* Cleaning code,

* Reverting changes,

* Fixing test,

* Copy to output required libs to fix tests

* Next fix

Co-authored-by: Jakub Chocholowicz <jachocho@microsoft.com>
fhnaseer added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2021
* First working version,

* Calling async method,

* Cleaning code,

* Reverting changes,

* Fixing test,

* Copy to output required libs to fix tests

* Next fix

Co-authored-by: Jakub Chocholowicz <jachocho@microsoft.com>

Co-authored-by: Jakub Chocholowicz <jachocho@microsoft.com>
Haplois added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2021
* Dynamic corelib.net loading (#2762) (#2803)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants