list-objects-v2: Add start_after parameter #744
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
balamurugana
reviewed
Jul 9, 2019
vadmeste
force-pushed
the
add-start-after
branch
3 times, most recently
from
b55d8d3
to
e5f94aa
Compare
When listing a bucket or a prefix which contains a lot of files, it is not possible to pause/resume listing using list-objects-v2 API, adding start_after will help the developer listing from a starting point without having to list everything again from the beginning.
|
This not an API breaking anymore: Old API: |
balamurugana
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2019
harshavardhana
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When listing a bucket or a prefix which contains a lot of files,
it is not possible to pause/resume listing using list-objects-v2
API, adding start_after will help the developer listing from a
starting point without having to list everything again from the
beginning.
Fix #718