Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 21, 2018. It is now read-only.

build process #264 #269

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 5, 2015
Merged

build process #264 #269

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 5, 2015

Conversation

snostorm
Copy link
Contributor

@snostorm snostorm commented Mar 4, 2015

Deep merge for i18n template.json, switches to source/project.js (vs json) --- one of many things for #264

Not sure how little/big to break up these PRs to, but I have other work which builds off of this which is still isn't merge-ready. This part is fairly safe as is and gives some guidance to i18n teams on some upcoming dictionary additions (although there will probably be more as index.md -> index.html)

@snostorm
Copy link
Contributor Author

snostorm commented Mar 5, 2015

@iojs/website would like to see if we can land this before more pieces come along (simplify the other PRs)

@therebelrobot
Copy link
Contributor

Build seemed to run ok. +1

therebelrobot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2015
@therebelrobot therebelrobot merged commit a5e0339 into master Mar 5, 2015
@snostorm
Copy link
Contributor Author

snostorm commented Mar 5, 2015

Good timing! Thanks @therebelrobot :) I literally just commented on #264 about wanting to put up the next PR once this merged.

@therebelrobot
Copy link
Contributor

yw :) Let me know if you need anything else reviewed today. I'll take time out for it.

@snostorm
Copy link
Contributor Author

snostorm commented Mar 5, 2015

Cool. I'll see if the other proof-of-concept is close enough or not. Build wise it is looking good but the "proof" of it is sitting in an html-driven home page which is in more of a "test" state.

@therebelrobot
Copy link
Contributor

Well, ping me on the thread or on IRC (are you in IRC?) and I'll check it out.

@snostorm snostorm deleted the 264_build_process branch March 6, 2015 19:36
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants