Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
doc: standardize references to userland
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Change occurrences of "user-land" to "userland".

PR-URL: #3192
Fixes: #3189
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
  • Loading branch information
MJefferson authored and Trott committed Oct 7, 2015
1 parent 66c9c61 commit f5a3f44
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2975,7 +2975,7 @@ https://iojs.org/api/tls.html
- Added async session storage events.
- Added async SNI callback.
- Added multi-key server support (for example, ECDSA+RSA server).
- Added optional callback to `checkServerIdentity` for manual certificate validation in user-land.
- Added optional callback to `checkServerIdentity` for manual certificate validation in userland.
- Added support for ECDSA/ECDHE cipher.
- Implemented TLS streams in C++, boosting their performance.
- Moved `createCredentials` to `tls` and renamed it to `createSecureContext`.
Expand Down
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions doc/tsc-meetings/io.js/2015-03-04.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -117,17 +117,17 @@ Discussion of how we should probably just add more Buffer methods to core.

Bert: there’s another aspect of this. At some point Node was really modern, but we’ve fallen behind. We can’t even get HTTP/2 or web sockets, we’re in trouble.

Domenic: we’ve learned a lot over the last few years that pushes us to user-land code instead of in core. But we need to have some things be “official.”
Domenic: we’ve learned a lot over the last few years that pushes us to userland code instead of in core. But we need to have some things be “official.”

Trevor: I would like the infrastructure for HTTP/2 to be similar to HTTP/1, with http-parser etc.

Ben: is there any reason HTTP/2 couldn’t be done in pure JS?

Discussion of http-parser and current HTTP/1 implementation strategy and speed.

Bert: I think as a TC what we should say is “we would like to support HTTP/2, but want to see some user-land ideas first.” We don’t need to actually start implementation progress right now.
Bert: I think as a TC what we should say is “we would like to support HTTP/2, but want to see some userland ideas first.” We don’t need to actually start implementation progress right now.

Ben: does anyone on the TC want to write a user-land HTTP/2 module?
Ben: does anyone on the TC want to write a userland HTTP/2 module?

Discussion of how Fedor already has a SPDY implementation.

Expand Down

0 comments on commit f5a3f44

Please sign in to comment.