Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Used 3rd person singular for consistency #2765

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

agcolom
Copy link
Contributor

@agcolom agcolom commented Sep 9, 2015

remove -> removes
Also, I don't know whether you have a CLA I should sign?

@mscdex mscdex added doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. events Issues and PRs related to the events subsystem / EventEmitter. labels Sep 9, 2015
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Sep 9, 2015

Looks good to me. Bonus change if you want to make it too: Execute to Executes in the description for emitter.event().

LGTM

(There's no CLA to sign. Closest thing might be the Developer's Certificate of Origin and the Code of Conduct at the bottom of https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md. But there's nothing to sign.)

@agcolom
Copy link
Contributor Author

agcolom commented Sep 9, 2015

@Trott brilliant! Thanks. Will make this additional change as suggested. Sorry for being super lazy and using the GH web editor ;-)

@agcolom
Copy link
Contributor Author

agcolom commented Sep 9, 2015

@Trott added the additional change to the patch-1 branch

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Sep 9, 2015

LGTM

1 similar comment
@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Sep 9, 2015

LGTM

@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ Returns a copy of the array of listeners for the specified event.

### emitter.emit(event[, arg1][, arg2][, ...])

Execute each of the listeners in order with the supplied arguments.
Executes each of the listeners in order with the supplied arguments.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While you're at it ... Calls?

@agcolom
Copy link
Contributor Author

agcolom commented Sep 10, 2015

@Trott @targos @nodejs/documentation Do you prefer Executes each of the listeners or Calls each of the listeners as suggested by @ronkorving ?

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Sep 10, 2015

I don't have any preference on this one

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Sep 10, 2015

No preference. Maybe someone on @nodejs/documentation has a preference on Executes vs. Calls in this context.

Trott pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2015
PR-URL: #2765
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Sep 10, 2015

Landed in d2f70fe

If anyone feels strongly about Calls over Executes, feel free to submit a subsequent PR. Thanks!

@Trott Trott closed this Sep 10, 2015
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2015
PR-URL: #2765
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2015
PR-URL: #2765
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
@rvagg rvagg mentioned this pull request Sep 12, 2015
@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2015
7 tasks
@rvagg rvagg mentioned this pull request Sep 22, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. events Issues and PRs related to the events subsystem / EventEmitter.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants