Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: ignore integrity values for git dependencies #4468

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2022
Merged

Conversation

lukekarrys
Copy link
Contributor

This updates pacote@13.0.3 and @npmcli/run-script@3.0.0

This updates pacote@13.0.3 and @npmcli/run-script@3.0.0
@lukekarrys lukekarrys requested a review from a team as a code owner February 24, 2022 19:06
@npm-robot
Copy link
Contributor

found 20 benchmarks with statistically significant performance improvements

  • app-large: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
  • app-medium: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
timing results
app-large clean lock-only cache-only cache-only
peer-deps
modules-only no-lock no-cache no-modules no-clean no-clean
audit
npm@8 49.161 ±1.33 29.037 ±0.13 16.409 ±0.15 18.509 ±0.55 2.763 ±0.05 2.730 ±0.03 2.209 ±0.02 10.783 ±0.02 2.200 ±0.00 3.170 ±0.01
#4468 0.402 ±0.00 0.404 ±0.00 0.418 ±0.02 0.400 ±0.00 0.403 ±0.00 0.405 ±0.00 0.412 ±0.00 0.406 ±0.00 0.406 ±0.00 0.401 ±0.00
app-medium clean lock-only cache-only cache-only
peer-deps
modules-only no-lock no-cache no-modules no-clean no-clean
audit
npm@8 35.223 ±0.01 21.963 ±0.41 12.436 ±0.08 13.411 ±0.04 2.489 ±0.05 2.519 ±0.03 2.212 ±0.01 8.083 ±0.12 2.094 ±0.01 2.897 ±0.10
#4468 0.407 ±0.00 0.408 ±0.00 0.408 ±0.00 0.413 ±0.01 0.406 ±0.00 0.409 ±0.00 0.408 ±0.00 0.417 ±0.01 0.408 ±0.00 0.407 ±0.00

@lukekarrys lukekarrys merged commit c608512 into release-next Feb 24, 2022
@lukekarrys lukekarrys deleted the lk/pacote branch February 24, 2022 19:32
@lukekarrys lukekarrys mentioned this pull request Feb 24, 2022
@olegdulin
Copy link

We have a similar need but for "file://" dependencies. I coulnd't find an existing issue, though. I am happy to create one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants