-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v0.26.3 merge master #2541
Merged
Merged
v0.26.3 merge master #2541
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…r.go Co-authored-by: Leo Zhang <zhangchiqing@gmail.com>
…r.go Co-authored-by: Leo Zhang <zhangchiqing@gmail.com>
1895: [State Sync] Add execution data requester r=peterargue a=peterargue Closes #1452 Closes #1897 This PR adds a new component for requesting `ExecutionData` from the network for newly sealed blocks. It does so by watching for finalized block notifications from hotstuff, and requesting data for each of the blocks included in the seals. This currently sets no expiration for the state data, which means nodes will keep the data for the duration of the spork. We're expecting that to be ~150GB per month. Theoretically, an operator could delete the execution data db, and restart the node with a specific start block if they need/want to prune. Longer term, we'll want to provide better options for managing disk usage. To Complete: - [x] Add to access node - [x] Add metrics - [x] Unit tests - [x] Integration tests Co-authored-by: Peter Argue <89119817+peterargue@users.noreply.github.com>
2514: Add BlockHeight to TransactionResultResponse r=zhangchiqing a=lolpuddle Depends on updates to .proto files for [this PR](onflow/flow#952) [Closes 2413](#2413) Co-authored-by: lolpuddle <oocean.cheung@gmail.com>
2524: Exit validation early for empty collections r=jordanschalm a=jordanschalm For empty collections, the reference height range was not set correctly, which resulted in checking for duplicates in all cluster blocks. This PR exits validation early for empty collections.⚠️ This PR also adds a mechanism for irrecoverable HotStuff errors, which currently are silently dropped. An issue to implement a more robust solution to this problem is in https://github.com/dapperlabs/flow-go/issues/6263. Notes: https://www.notion.so/dapperlabs/Transaction-De-Dupe-Deployment-Notes-8027bde5183a4e4c931bb1d42905952a Co-authored-by: Jordan Schalm <jordan@dapperlabs.com>
2509: [Crypto] improve flaky random test r=tarakby a=tarakby A rare flakiness has been seen in a statistical tests under crypto/random - use math rand and add logging for failing tests seeds - use higher sampling for a statistical test to avoid flakiness (the higher the sampling, the closer the result to theoretical distribution) cc `@durkmurder` Co-authored-by: Tarak Ben Youssef <tarak.benyoussef@dapperlabs.com> Co-authored-by: Tarak Ben Youssef <50252200+tarakby@users.noreply.github.com>
2167: Add secure-cadence prefix as a tag to be pushed r=Kay-Zee a=Kay-Zee Previously, our makefile only recognizes tags starting with `v` as acceptable, this just adds the `secure-cadence` prefix as one that we're also building Co-authored-by: Kay-Zee <kan@axiomzen.co> Co-authored-by: Kan Zhang <kan@axiomzen.co>
2511: chore(tests): do not go through the resolver for localhost r=SaveTheRbtz a=SaveTheRbtz Currently, we go through the resolver codepath each time we create a local connection. This is not too expensive for the benchmark (though it can create unexpected spikes in latencies), but it can be expensive for the docker's resolver. To avoid DDoS'ing it, let's use `127.0.0.1` for now. If our nodes switch to IPv6-only we can switch this to `::1`. Co-authored-by: Alexey Ivanov <SaveTheRbtz@GMail.com>
PR Migrate ingestion engine to new Component interface
[Fix] add explicit mapping of cluster prefix -> message codes
kc1116
approved these changes
Jun 2, 2022
zhangchiqing
requested review from
SaveTheRbtz,
simonhf,
Kay-Zee,
tarakby,
yhassanzadeh13 and
vishalchangrani
as code owners
June 2, 2022 21:04
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bringing to v0.26