Update to Cadence v1.0.0-M9

[turbolent]

Description

Automatically update to:

• onflow/flow-go-sdk v1.0.0-M8
• onflow/cadence v1.0.0-M9

Note: Hide whitespace changes to see actual API adjustments

[turbolent]

So weird, TestGetAccountKey/Multiple_keys fails, the order of the fields in the string representation of PublicKey changed? 🤔

[turbolent]

@SupunS I did a git bisect on the Cadence side, and it seems like the test starts to fail starting with onflow/cadence@07a7f97. No idea yet why those change would somehow influence the iteration order of composite values' fields (atree ordered map keys)

[turbolent]

Given that PublicKey values are just normal composite values, I guess there is no guaranteed order, as the iteration order of atree ordered maps depends on e.g. the seed of the value. I adjusted the test

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.18750% with 10 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 55.35%. Comparing base (524be1e) to head (24e14af).

Files	Patch %	Lines
fvm/evm/stdlib/contract.go	92.18%	5 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                    Coverage Diff                     @@
##           feature/stable-cadence    #5498      +/-   ##
==========================================================
- Coverage                   55.99%   55.35%   -0.64%     
==========================================================
  Files                        1042      998      -44     
  Lines                      101982    96675    -5307     
==========================================================
- Hits                        57100    53514    -3586     
+ Misses                      40529    39064    -1465     
+ Partials                     4353     4097     -256     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	55.35% <92.18%> (-0.64%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[turbolent]

Some tests fail, but they also fail on the target (feature) branch, due to #5482. Will merge anyway, we can fix those unrelated tests separately. Already pinged in the linked PR