Add maintainer nomination template #919
Conversation
nishakm
requested review from
jonjohnsonjr,
jonboulle,
stevvooe,
vbatts and
cyphar
as code owners
|
+1 |
nishakm
force-pushed
the
912-maintainer-template
branch
from
4ae7dcc
to
75e5f8e
Compare
|
I'd lean towards making the Justification section contain a comment describing possible ways to nominees could have activity, rather than fixed headings. It gives flexibility to participate in different ways. Some may attend meetings, respond on the mailing list, in slack, and I think all sorts of contributions should be valuable. The key part for me is whether they'll help respond to PRs since that's the primary responsibility for being a maintainer that I see. I think we also want to look at what other templates would be useful, but that can be separate from this PR. |
| ### Community Activity | ||
|
|
||
| ### Working Group Activity | ||
|
|
||
| ### OCI Contributions |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@nishakm - want to just remove these 3 headings for now so we can get this in?
|
May 26 meeting: remove headings under justification and instead add comment on possible work a nominator can highlight |
This is a PR template to propose adding new maintainers Fixes opencontainers#912 Signed-off-by: nisha <nisha@ctlfsh.tech>
nishakm
force-pushed
the
912-maintainer-template
branch
from
75e5f8e
to
ba3f174
Compare
|
@opencontainers/image-spec-maintainers PTAL |
|
Can we get a merge on this? |
This is a PR template to propose adding new maintainers
Fixes #912
Signed-off-by: nisha nisha@ctlfsh.tech