Provide mechanism to configure XContent parsing constraints (after update to Jackson 2.15.0 and above)

[reta]

Description

Provide mechanism to configure XContent parsing constraints (after update to Jackson 2.15.0 and above)

Related Issues

Resolves #7549

Check List

• New functionality includes testing.
  • All tests pass
• New functionality has been documented.
  • New functionality has javadoc added
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff
• Commit changes are listed out in CHANGELOG.md file (See: Changelog)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[reta]

@andrross @dblock curious what do you think folks, @martin-gaievski @ylwu-amzn fyi

[github-actions]

Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:

• RESULT: UNSTABLE ❕
• TEST FAILURES:

      1 org.opensearch.cluster.routing.allocation.decider.DiskThresholdDeciderIT.testIndexCreateBlockIsRemovedWhenAnyNodesNotExceedHighWatermarkWithAutoReleaseEnabled

• URL: https://build.ci.opensearch.org/job/gradle-check/15328/
• CommitID: 7712ed6
  Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #7550 (a82198b) into main (e44b3f1) will increase coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #7550      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     70.47%   70.57%   +0.09%     
- Complexity    59728    59764      +36     
============================================
  Files          4896     4896              
  Lines        286798   286810      +12     
  Branches      41331    41331              
============================================
+ Hits         202133   202426     +293     
+ Misses        68078    67705     -373     
- Partials      16587    16679      +92     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
.../opensearch/common/xcontent/cbor/CborXContent.java	83.33% <100.00%> (+3.33%)	⬆️
.../opensearch/common/xcontent/json/JsonXContent.java	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...pensearch/common/xcontent/smile/SmileXContent.java	89.47% <100.00%> (+1.97%)	⬆️
.../opensearch/common/xcontent/yaml/YamlXContent.java	87.50% <100.00%> (+2.88%)	⬆️

... and 518 files with indirect coverage changes

[github-actions]

Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:

• RESULT: SUCCESS ✅
• URL: https://build.ci.opensearch.org/job/gradle-check/15331/
• CommitID: 0630d65

[github-actions]

Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:

• RESULT: FAILURE ❌
• URL: https://build.ci.opensearch.org/job/gradle-check/15335/
• CommitID: 782c0db
  Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green.
  Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

[github-actions]

Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:

• RESULT: FAILURE ❌
• URL: https://build.ci.opensearch.org/job/gradle-check/15338/
• CommitID: 14be00c
  Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green.
  Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

[github-actions]

Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:

• RESULT: SUCCESS ✅
• URL: https://build.ci.opensearch.org/job/gradle-check/15336/
• CommitID: 02a3321

[github-actions]

Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:

• RESULT: SUCCESS ✅
• URL: https://build.ci.opensearch.org/job/gradle-check/15339/
• CommitID: c32d3fa

[github-actions]

Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:

• RESULT: SUCCESS ✅
• URL: https://build.ci.opensearch.org/job/gradle-check/15399/
• CommitID: a82198b

[martin-gaievski]

@andrross could you please review again, seems that Andriy (reta) has been addressed your previous comments? This change should unblock several plugins that are blocked by jackson 2.15 upgrade

[andrross]

@reta Sorry I missed this prior to merging, but since this introduces a new setting for cluster operators I think this merits a changelog entry. What do you think?

[reta]

@reta Sorry I missed this prior to merging, but since this introduces a new setting for cluster operators I think this merits a changelog entry. What do you think?

I will do that (in a moment) and also include the documentation issue, thank you