Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.0] Staging for version increment automation #440

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

opensearch-trigger-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport 7af37c8 from #437

Signed-off-by: pgodithi <pgodithi@amazon.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7af37c8)
@opensearch-trigger-bot opensearch-trigger-bot bot requested a review from a team July 12, 2022 21:25
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #440 (7af37c8) into 2.0 (8ae8b4a) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 7af37c8 differs from pull request most recent head 2d32676. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2d32676 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                2.0     #440   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     84.02%   84.02%           
  Complexity      911      911           
=========================================
  Files           130      130           
  Lines          3880     3880           
  Branches        359      359           
=========================================
  Hits           3260     3260           
  Misses          458      458           
  Partials        162      162           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...rg/opensearch/knn/index/codec/KNNCodecFactory.java 71.42% <ø> (ø)
...earch/knn/plugin/script/KNNWhitelistExtension.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...java/org/opensearch/knn/training/VectorReader.java 83.56% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8ae8b4a...2d32676. Read the comment docs.

@prudhvigodithi
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this PR in favor of #442

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants