Update dependency org.apache.lucene:lucene-core to v9.5.0

[mend-for-github-com]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
org.apache.lucene:lucene-core (source)	9.4.2 -> 9.5.0

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

[dbwiddis]

I would really like a system where we stay in sync with OpenSearch core version. @saratvemulapalli @ryanbogan is dependency version compatibility part of your versioning work/

[saratvemulapalli]

I would really like a system where we stay in sync with OpenSearch core version. @saratvemulapalli @ryanbogan is dependency version compatibility part of your versioning work/

Thats a good point. Its not part of #337. But this is a solved problem for plugins. We could use gradle[1]

[1] https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/platforms.html#sub:central-declaration-of-dependencies

[dbwiddis]

I would really like a system where we stay in sync with OpenSearch core version. @saratvemulapalli @ryanbogan is dependency version compatibility part of your versioning work/

Thats a good point. Its not part of #337. But this is a solved problem for plugins. We could use gradle[1]

[1] https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/platforms.html#sub:central-declaration-of-dependencies

See opensearch-project/opensearch-build#2689

[saratvemulapalli]

@dbwiddis taking a look at this: I dont think SDK has any dependencies on lucene at this point[1].
I can send out a change to remove it. I've tested it locally.

[1] https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aopensearch-project%2Fopensearch-sdk-java%20org.apache.lucene&type=code

[dbwiddis]

Might be needed for AnalysisPlugin (AnalysisExtension) migration.

[dbwiddis]

So yes it's definitely going to be needed for AnalysisExtension to migrate AnalysisPlugin.

I'm ok with removing it now, if the long term plan is to add it back via a dependency catalog per your suggestion.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #388 (23f7414) into main (514f796) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #388   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     62.32%   62.32%           
  Complexity      159      159           
=========================================
  Files            30       30           
  Lines           730      730           
  Branches         20       20           
=========================================
  Hits            455      455           
  Misses          266      266           
  Partials          9        9           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[owaiskazi19]

We have removed lucene here: #465. Closing this PR.