Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-3.9] UPSTREAM: <carry>: Remove write permissions on daemonsets from Kubernetes bootstrap policy #18977

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #18971

/assign tnozicka

enj added 2 commits March 14, 2018 13:59
…etes bootstrap policy

Due to how daemonsets interact with the project node selector,
we need to limit write access to them to the cluster admin.

Bug 1536304
Bug 1501514

Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 14, 2018
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Mar 14, 2018
@tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 14, 2018
@tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @mfojtik

@tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor

/test gcp

@enj
Copy link
Contributor

enj commented Mar 14, 2018

/lgtm

Tagging so we can get this in the queue ASAP.

@enj enj added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Mar 14, 2018
@tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor

/test gcp

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@simo5
Copy link
Contributor

simo5 commented Mar 14, 2018

/test extended_conformance_install

@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor

mfojtik commented Mar 14, 2018

This is 3.9 blocker, the flakes are unrelated to the changes and other tests are passing fine. @simo5 are you fine merging this via button?

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Mar 14, 2018

/lgtm

It does what's on the tin, but I'm not completely sure you thought this through.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, enj, openshift-cherrypick-robot, tnozicka

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Mar 14, 2018

/retest

@simo5
Copy link
Contributor

simo5 commented Mar 14, 2018

@mfojtik go for it

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic merge from submit-queue.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/test all [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor

CI is borked.

It will get stuck on #18987 anyways since the bot doesn't have permissions to merge. It already tried to merge this PR in #18977 (comment)

@mfojtik @simo5 Someone likely needs to hit the green button to merge this in time.

@tnozicka tnozicka added this to the v3.9 milestone Mar 15, 2018
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Mar 15, 2018

merging for michal

@deads2k deads2k merged commit b647c76 into openshift:release-3.9 Mar 15, 2018
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Mar 15, 2018

Talking about it in aos, I'm less sure that the repercussions of this were fully considered. This breaks existing manifests in new clusters, it drifts from upstream, and it invalidates existing examples and manifest online, to correct a controller backoff problem?

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/openshift-jenkins/gcp 8e32f77 link /test gcp
ci/openshift-jenkins/extended_conformance_install 8e32f77 link /test extended_conformance_install

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. queue/critical-fix size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants