-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prepare for release 2.3.1 #294
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll merge and publish once CI is done
A run of
All of these boil down to a single |
I feel like for binaries it makes sense to have no outdated compatible version, but for libraries I think there is no need to be always with the latest compatible version, our library parity_scale_codec support both byte_slice_cast 1.0.0 and 1.1.0 there is no need to force our user to use byte_slice_cast 1.1.0 it is their choice to use any of the version. That said maybe it is a good practice to do it anyway so that our test suite is run against the latest version. For bitvec we are on the latest compatible version, and as we use it publicly (we implement codec on some of its type) then upgrading to a new major version is a breaking change and I would prefer not to release parity_scale_codec major version at the same (quite fast) rate as bitvec. To conclude I think it is not needed |
published with tags :-) |
2.3.0
to2.3.1
.