Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed RPC subscriptions leak when subscription stream is finished #4533

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 21, 2024

Conversation

svyatonik
Copy link
Contributor

closes paritytech/parity-bridges-common#3000

Recently we've changed our bridge configuration for Rococo <> Westend and our new relayer has started to submit transactions every ~ 30 seconds. Eventually, it switches itself into limbo state, where it can't submit more transactions - all author_submitAndWatchExtrinsic calls are failing with the following error: ERROR bridge Failed to send transaction to BridgeHubRococo node: Call(ErrorObject { code: ServerError(-32006), message: "Too many subscriptions on the connection", data: Some(RawValue("Exceeded max limit of 1024")) }).

Some links for those who want to explore:

I've illustrated the issue with small test - you may ensure that if e.g. the stream is initially empty, the subscription_is_dropped_when_stream_is_empty will hang because pipe_from_stream never exits.

@svyatonik svyatonik added the T0-node This PR/Issue is related to the topic “node”. label May 21, 2024
@svyatonik svyatonik requested review from niklasad1 and a team May 21, 2024 10:10
Copy link
Contributor

@acatangiu acatangiu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice catch! 💯

@svyatonik svyatonik added this pull request to the merge queue May 21, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit d54feeb May 21, 2024
149 of 152 checks passed
@svyatonik svyatonik deleted the sv-fix-rpc-subscription-leak branch May 21, 2024 11:07
@niklasad1
Copy link
Member

@svyatonik nice digging and you got it right.

I guess we could maybe remove this subscription limit since the server is backpressured these days

hitchhooker pushed a commit to ibp-network/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
…ritytech#4533)

closes paritytech/parity-bridges-common#3000

Recently we've changed our bridge configuration for Rococo <> Westend
and our new relayer has started to submit transactions every ~ `30`
seconds. Eventually, it switches itself into limbo state, where it can't
submit more transactions - all `author_submitAndWatchExtrinsic` calls
are failing with the following error: `ERROR bridge Failed to send
transaction to BridgeHubRococo node: Call(ErrorObject { code:
ServerError(-32006), message: "Too many subscriptions on the
connection", data: Some(RawValue("Exceeded max limit of 1024")) })`.

Some links for those who want to explore:
- server side (node) has a strict limit on a number of active
subscriptions. It fails to open a new subscription if this limit is hit:
https://github.com/paritytech/jsonrpsee/blob/a4533966b997e83632509ad97eea010fc7c3efc0/server/src/middleware/rpc/layer/rpc_service.rs#L122-L132.
The limit is set to `1024` by default;
- internally this limit is a semaphore with `limit` permits:
https://github.com/paritytech/jsonrpsee/blob/a4533966b997e83632509ad97eea010fc7c3efc0/core/src/server/subscription.rs#L461-L485;
- semaphore permit is acquired in the first link;
- the permit is "returned" when the `SubscriptionSink` is dropped:
https://github.com/paritytech/jsonrpsee/blob/a4533966b997e83632509ad97eea010fc7c3efc0/core/src/server/subscription.rs#L310-L325;
- the `SubscriptionSink` is dropped when [this `polkadot-sdk`
function](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/278486f9bf7db06c174203f098eec2f91839757a/substrate/client/rpc/src/utils.rs#L58-L94)
returns. In other words - when the connection is closed, the stream is
finished or internal subscription buffer limit is hit;
- the subscription has the internal buffer, so sending an item contains
of two steps: [reading an item from the underlying
stream](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/278486f9bf7db06c174203f098eec2f91839757a/substrate/client/rpc/src/utils.rs#L125-L141)
and [sending it over the
connection](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/278486f9bf7db06c174203f098eec2f91839757a/substrate/client/rpc/src/utils.rs#L111-L116);
- when the underlying stream is finished, the `inner_pipe_from_stream`
wants to ensure that all items are sent to the subscriber. So it: [waits
until the current send operation
completes](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/278486f9bf7db06c174203f098eec2f91839757a/substrate/client/rpc/src/utils.rs#L146-L148)
and then [send all remaining items from the internal
buffer](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/278486f9bf7db06c174203f098eec2f91839757a/substrate/client/rpc/src/utils.rs#L150-L155).
Once it is done, the function returns, the `SubscriptionSink` is
dropped, semaphore permit is dropped and we are ready to accept new
subscriptions;
- unfortunately, the code just calls the `pending_fut.await.is_err()` to
ensure that [the current send operation
completes](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/278486f9bf7db06c174203f098eec2f91839757a/substrate/client/rpc/src/utils.rs#L146-L148).
But if there are no current send operation (which is normal), then the
`pending_fut` is set to terminated future and the `await` never
completes. Hence, no return from the function, no drop of
`SubscriptionSink`, no drop of semaphore permit, no new subscriptions
allowed (once number of susbcriptions hits the limit.

I've illustrated the issue with small test - you may ensure that if e.g.
the stream is initially empty, the
`subscription_is_dropped_when_stream_is_empty` will hang because
`pipe_from_stream` never exits.
TarekkMA pushed a commit to moonbeam-foundation/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2024
…ritytech#4533)

closes paritytech/parity-bridges-common#3000

Recently we've changed our bridge configuration for Rococo <> Westend
and our new relayer has started to submit transactions every ~ `30`
seconds. Eventually, it switches itself into limbo state, where it can't
submit more transactions - all `author_submitAndWatchExtrinsic` calls
are failing with the following error: `ERROR bridge Failed to send
transaction to BridgeHubRococo node: Call(ErrorObject { code:
ServerError(-32006), message: "Too many subscriptions on the
connection", data: Some(RawValue("Exceeded max limit of 1024")) })`.

Some links for those who want to explore:
- server side (node) has a strict limit on a number of active
subscriptions. It fails to open a new subscription if this limit is hit:
https://github.com/paritytech/jsonrpsee/blob/a4533966b997e83632509ad97eea010fc7c3efc0/server/src/middleware/rpc/layer/rpc_service.rs#L122-L132.
The limit is set to `1024` by default;
- internally this limit is a semaphore with `limit` permits:
https://github.com/paritytech/jsonrpsee/blob/a4533966b997e83632509ad97eea010fc7c3efc0/core/src/server/subscription.rs#L461-L485;
- semaphore permit is acquired in the first link;
- the permit is "returned" when the `SubscriptionSink` is dropped:
https://github.com/paritytech/jsonrpsee/blob/a4533966b997e83632509ad97eea010fc7c3efc0/core/src/server/subscription.rs#L310-L325;
- the `SubscriptionSink` is dropped when [this `polkadot-sdk`
function](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/278486f9bf7db06c174203f098eec2f91839757a/substrate/client/rpc/src/utils.rs#L58-L94)
returns. In other words - when the connection is closed, the stream is
finished or internal subscription buffer limit is hit;
- the subscription has the internal buffer, so sending an item contains
of two steps: [reading an item from the underlying
stream](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/278486f9bf7db06c174203f098eec2f91839757a/substrate/client/rpc/src/utils.rs#L125-L141)
and [sending it over the
connection](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/278486f9bf7db06c174203f098eec2f91839757a/substrate/client/rpc/src/utils.rs#L111-L116);
- when the underlying stream is finished, the `inner_pipe_from_stream`
wants to ensure that all items are sent to the subscriber. So it: [waits
until the current send operation
completes](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/278486f9bf7db06c174203f098eec2f91839757a/substrate/client/rpc/src/utils.rs#L146-L148)
and then [send all remaining items from the internal
buffer](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/278486f9bf7db06c174203f098eec2f91839757a/substrate/client/rpc/src/utils.rs#L150-L155).
Once it is done, the function returns, the `SubscriptionSink` is
dropped, semaphore permit is dropped and we are ready to accept new
subscriptions;
- unfortunately, the code just calls the `pending_fut.await.is_err()` to
ensure that [the current send operation
completes](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/278486f9bf7db06c174203f098eec2f91839757a/substrate/client/rpc/src/utils.rs#L146-L148).
But if there are no current send operation (which is normal), then the
`pending_fut` is set to terminated future and the `await` never
completes. Hence, no return from the function, no drop of
`SubscriptionSink`, no drop of semaphore permit, no new subscriptions
allowed (once number of susbcriptions hits the limit.

I've illustrated the issue with small test - you may ensure that if e.g.
the stream is initially empty, the
`subscription_is_dropped_when_stream_is_empty` will hang because
`pipe_from_stream` never exits.
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T0-node This PR/Issue is related to the topic “node”.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Jsonrpsee subscriptions are leaking
4 participants