Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

StorageWeightReclaim: Fix issue when underestimating refund. #5273

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 9, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
48 changes: 43 additions & 5 deletions cumulus/primitives/storage-weight-reclaim/src/lib.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -165,15 +165,14 @@ where
);
return Ok(())
};
let benchmarked_weight = info.weight.proof_size();
let consumed_weight = post_dispatch_proof_size.saturating_sub(pre_dispatch_proof_size);

// Unspent weight according to the `actual_weight` from `PostDispatchInfo`
// This unspent weight will be refunded by the `CheckWeight` extension, so we need to
// account for that.
let unspent = post_info.calc_unspent(info).proof_size();
let storage_size_diff =
benchmarked_weight.saturating_sub(unspent).abs_diff(consumed_weight as u64);
let benchmarked_weight = info.weight.proof_size().saturating_sub(unspent);
let consumed_weight = post_dispatch_proof_size.saturating_sub(pre_dispatch_proof_size);

let storage_size_diff = benchmarked_weight.abs_diff(consumed_weight as u64);

// This value will be reclaimed by [`frame_system::CheckWeight`], so we need to calculate
// that in.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -294,6 +293,45 @@ mod tests {
})
}

#[test]
fn underestimating_refund() {
// We fixed a bug where `pre dispatch info weight > consumed weight > post info weight`
// resulted in error.

// The real cost will be 100 bytes of storage size
let mut test_ext = setup_test_externalities(&[0, 100]);

test_ext.execute_with(|| {
set_current_storage_weight(1000);

// Benchmarked storage weight: 500
let info = DispatchInfo { weight: Weight::from_parts(0, 101), ..Default::default() };
let post_info = PostDispatchInfo {
actual_weight: Some(Weight::from_parts(0, 99)),
pays_fee: Default::default(),
};

assert_ok!(CheckWeight::<Test>::do_pre_dispatch(&info, LEN));

let pre = StorageWeightReclaim::<Test>(PhantomData)
.pre_dispatch(&ALICE, CALL, &info, LEN)
.unwrap();
assert_eq!(pre, Some(0));

assert_ok!(CheckWeight::<Test>::post_dispatch(None, &info, &post_info, 0, &Ok(())));
// We expect an accrue of 1
assert_ok!(StorageWeightReclaim::<Test>::post_dispatch(
Some(pre),
&info,
&post_info,
LEN,
&Ok(())
));

assert_eq!(get_storage_weight().total().proof_size(), 1250);
})
}

#[test]
fn does_nothing_without_extension() {
let mut test_ext = new_test_ext();
Expand Down
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions prdoc/pr_5273.prdoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
title: Fix storage weight reclaim bug.

doc:
- audience: Runtime Dev
description: |
A bug in storage weight reclaim signed extension is fixed. The bug was causing an underestimate of the proof size when the post dispatch info was underestimating the proof size and the pre dispatch info was overestimating the proof size at the same time.

crates:
- name: cumulus-primitives-storage-weight-reclaim
bump: patch
Loading