Update inconsistent schema usage in to_form example
#2734
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The example starts defining a user schema and then goes on to generate a blog post form and example parameters. Updated example to be consistent with a post schema. Also cleaned up the use of "which", which is generally seen as nonrestrictive (it could be left off without changing the meaning).
03juan
changed the title
to_form exampleto_form example
|
Apologies, my decision to use a post schema was arbitrary. After reviewing the rest of the documentation for this module, it's better to stick to user. |
03juan
changed the title
to_form exampleto_form example
|
💚 💙 💜 💛 ❤️ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The example starts defining a user schema and then goes on to generate a blog post form and example parameters.
Updated example to be consistent with a post schema.
Also cleaned up the use of "which", which is generally seen as nonrestrictive (it could be left off without changing the meaning).