Feat: implements #127

[SukkaW]

I create a draft PR since It is just a Proof of Concept for #127. The PR is meant to allow for discussion and showing some refactoring issues going on.

[SukkaW]

@Scrum Also, what do you think about add tree.oncontent, tree.onattrs and tree.onnode to posthtml?

[maltsev]

I quickly skimmed the code. I like this new approach! Let me take a more detailed look over the weekend.

@SukkaW did you do any speed benchmarks?

[SukkaW]

@SukkaW did you do any speed benchmarks?

Not "official" and correct benchmark approach, only tested on my own website, and it is indeed faster.

It will be better if we have:

• Discuss a better API design (better naming, etc.)
• An Official API provided by PostHTML that we can utilize.

[maltsev]

An Official API provided by PostHTML that we can utilize.

Which one? Did they add something new in the recent releases?

---

I really appreciate you did such a big refactoring! It's really nice having such great contributors :-)

[netlify]

‼️ Deploy request for htmlnano rejected.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	69637b2

[SukkaW]

@maltsev

I pick up the PR, rewrite it, and make it ready for review.

And here are the changes after the rewrite:

• Use camelCase for named export: onAttrs, onNode, onContent instead of previous onattrs, onnode and oncontent.
• The new module format no longer requires a once = true named export.

[SukkaW]

@maltsev I forgot to mark the PR as ready for review.

[maltsev]

Thanks!

@SukkaW Unfortunately, I don't have time in the near future to do the proper review. But all your previous contributions were of top-notch quality. So I'm fine with just accepting this PR and releasing a new htmlnano version. Are you okay with that?

[SukkaW]

Thanks!

@SukkaW Unfortunately, I don't have time in the near future to do the proper review. But all your previous contributions were of top-notch quality. So I'm fine with just accepting this PR and releasing a new htmlnano version. Are you okay with that?

Actually, I have already tested the PR on my own project (published as @sukkaw/htmlnano) and it works fine for me. The PR shouldn't cause issues.

Also, the fix for #180 (#181) should be included in a new version, too.

[maltsev]

Awesome! I'm going to merge it now then. I'll release the new version in the coming days.

[maltsev]

I released the new version.