Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated spec with reviews by @Herringway #5

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 4, 2022

Conversation

ValwareIRC
Copy link

@ValwareIRC ValwareIRC commented Jul 4, 2022

  • Corrected some keys in example displays
  • Corrected a couple of missing ':' prefix in an example displays
  • Deduplicated RPL_METADATASUBS in the numerics table
  • Replaced RPL_ placeholders with their actual numeric value in examples

Only thing I didn't touch is this one purely because the spec already mentions that metadata-2 requires batch to work, so shouldn't be a problem =]

Thank you @Herringway for taking the time to point these out!

- Corrected some keys in example displays
- Corrected a couple of missing ':' prefix in an example displays
- Deduplicated `RPL_METADATASUBS` in the numerics table
- Replaced RPL_ placeholders with their actual numeric value in examples

Only thing I didn't touch is [this one](ircv3#501 (comment)) purely because the spec already mentions that `metadata-2` requires `batch` to work, so shouldn't be a problem =]

Thank you Herringway for taking the time to point these out!
@Herringway
Copy link

sorry, I wasn't as clear on that one as I should have been. I meant that RPL_METADATASUBS replies aren't in a batch or have an end-of-list numeric, so they're a little tricky to deal with. Without those, it's hard to know when you've got a complete response

@progval
Copy link
Owner

progval commented Jul 4, 2022

@Herringway good point. I wonder if we should add another batch type for this. (I feel making a labeled-response batch mandatory for this particular case would be somewhat abusive)

@progval progval merged commit d09cad5 into progval:metadata Jul 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants