reviewdog: Too many results (annotations) in diff. You may miss some annotations due to GitHub limitation for annotation created by logging command. Please check GitHub Actions log console to see all results. Limitation: - 10 warning annotations and 10 error annotations per step - 50 annotations per job (sum of annotations from all the steps) - 50 annotations per run (separate from the job annotations, these annotations aren't created by users) Source: https://github.hscsec.cnmunity/t5/GitHub-Actions/Maximum-number-of-annotations-that-can-be-created-using-GitHub/m-p/39085

reviewdog exited with status code: 1

[vale] reported by reviewdog 🐶 [Quarkus.TermsSuggestions] Depending on the context, consider using 'by using' or 'that uses' rather than 'using'. Raw Output: {"message": "[Quarkus.TermsSuggestions] Depending on the context, consider using 'by using' or 'that uses' rather than 'using'.", "location": {"path": "docs/src/main/asciidoc/security-openid-connect-client-registration.adoc", "range": {"start": {"line": 24, "column": 76}}}, "severity": "INFO"}

[vale] reported by reviewdog 🐶 [Quarkus.TermsSuggestions] Depending on the context, consider using 'by using' or 'that uses' rather than 'using'. Raw Output: {"message": "[Quarkus.TermsSuggestions] Depending on the context, consider using 'by using' or 'that uses' rather than 'using'.", "location": {"path": "docs/src/main/asciidoc/security-openid-connect-client-registration.adoc", "range": {"start": {"line": 24, "column": 361}}}, "severity": "INFO"}

[vale] reported by reviewdog 🐶 [Quarkus.Headings] Use sentence-style capitalization in 'Oidc Client Registration'. Raw Output: {"message": "[Quarkus.Headings] Use sentence-style capitalization in 'Oidc Client Registration'.", "location": {"path": "docs/src/main/asciidoc/security-openid-connect-client-registration.adoc", "range": {"start": {"line": 26, "column": 4}}}, "severity": "INFO"}

[vale] reported by reviewdog 🐶 [Quarkus.Spelling] Use correct American English spelling. Did you really mean 'Oidc'? Raw Output: {"message": "[Quarkus.Spelling] Use correct American English spelling. Did you really mean 'Oidc'?", "location": {"path": "docs/src/main/asciidoc/security-openid-connect-client-registration.adoc", "range": {"start": {"line": 26, "column": 4}}}, "severity": "WARNING"}

[vale] reported by reviewdog 🐶 [Quarkus.TermsSuggestions] Depending on the context, consider using 'by using' or 'that uses' rather than 'using'. Raw Output: {"message": "[Quarkus.TermsSuggestions] Depending on the context, consider using 'by using' or 'that uses' rather than 'using'.", "location": {"path": "docs/src/main/asciidoc/security-openid-connect-client-registration.adoc", "range": {"start": {"line": 38, "column": 85}}}, "severity": "INFO"}

[vale] reported by reviewdog 🐶 [Quarkus.TermsSuggestions] Depending on the context, consider using 'by using' or 'that uses' rather than 'using'. Raw Output: {"message": "[Quarkus.TermsSuggestions] Depending on the context, consider using 'by using' or 'that uses' rather than 'using'.", "location": {"path": "docs/src/main/asciidoc/security-openid-connect-client-registration.adoc", "range": {"start": {"line": 41, "column": 53}}}, "severity": "INFO"}

[vale] reported by reviewdog 🐶 [Quarkus.TermsSuggestions] Depending on the context, consider using ', which (non restrictive clause preceded by a comma)' or 'that (restrictive clause without a comma)' rather than 'which'. Raw Output: {"message": "[Quarkus.TermsSuggestions] Depending on the context, consider using ', which (non restrictive clause preceded by a comma)' or 'that (restrictive clause without a comma)' rather than 'which'.", "location": {"path": "docs/src/main/asciidoc/security-openid-connect-client-registration.adoc", "range": {"start": {"line": 41, "column": 108}}}, "severity": "INFO"}

[vale] reported by reviewdog 🐶 [Quarkus.TermsSuggestions] Depending on the context, consider using ', which (non restrictive clause preceded by a comma)' or 'that (restrictive clause without a comma)' rather than 'which'. Raw Output: {"message": "[Quarkus.TermsSuggestions] Depending on the context, consider using ', which (non restrictive clause preceded by a comma)' or 'that (restrictive clause without a comma)' rather than 'which'.", "location": {"path": "docs/src/main/asciidoc/security-openid-connect-client-registration.adoc", "range": {"start": {"line": 41, "column": 198}}}, "severity": "INFO"}

[vale] reported by reviewdog 🐶 [Quarkus.TermsWarnings] Consider using 'might (for possiblity)' or 'can (for ability)' rather than 'may' unless updating existing content that uses the term. Raw Output: {"message": "[Quarkus.TermsWarnings] Consider using 'might (for possiblity)' or 'can (for ability)' rather than 'may' unless updating existing content that uses the term.", "location": {"path": "docs/src/main/asciidoc/security-openid-connect-client-registration.adoc", "range": {"start": {"line": 68, "column": 8}}}, "severity": "WARNING"}