Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support RS in GF(2^k) for k <= 8 #18

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

support RS in GF(2^k) for k <= 8 #18

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

brian-armstrong
Copy link
Member

This should make it possible to use RS modes for non GF(2^8). Because many internal types are uint8_t, we can't go past 2^8.

@fly-feixiang
Copy link

If we modify uint8_t to uint16_t, and can resolve the GF(2^k) for k=16 ?

@brian-armstrong
Copy link
Member Author

brian-armstrong commented Nov 6, 2018

@fly-feixiang It won't be as easy as just widening the type. That type is so critical to how everything works that there will be a lot of explicit and implicit dependencies on it being that wide. For example, there are a lot of loops and arrays that run on 256 (or 512) items and would instead need to run 2^16 (or 2^17) items. There may also be optimizations that need to be reworked to give appropriate performance for k > 8.

I don't think the changes will be too big, but every single line of code needs to be reviewed to see how it will be affected and then new tests written to ensure everything still works.

This isn't particularly high priority for me, but if you want to get started, I can point you to what changes would be needed.

@fly-feixiang
Copy link

Thanks for your reply.

In most devices, the page size is set to 4096 bytes, such as the phone, so we want to apply this algorithm to the phone.We also used the BCH algorithm implemented in the linux kernel, which has good performance, but it is under the GPL, which we can't use.

I want to extend it to k=12 now. If I have any difficulty, I will ask you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants