Alternative Graph from Me #1
Conversation
New Graph is in the file "Connections_Chris". Old Graph still there - Contain (mostly) everything from the original - Slightly changed logic - Naming changed to better readable Capitalized Naming schema instead of variable like naming scheme. Still Underscores though (like it) - Sensor Technologies added inbetween the vital signs and the tracking device - trackers have inbound sensor technologies/parameters and outbound (calculated) parameters (This makes obvious the difference between research wearables, which offer raw data acces and consumer wearables which mostly only give access to calculated metrics in outbound) - Vital signs and other measurements are more intensely and finegrained interconnected - Graph looks therefore like a mess right now. However this will be fixed once enough tracking devices are added. Right now there are not enough tracking devices in comparison to vital parameters. - Currently not adjusted the weights - Still a lot to add/do! :)
|
It would be better to see your ideas with a manageable number of items so I should accept the push. But I have questions. Sensor Technologies added inbetween the vital signs and the tracking device trackers have inbound sensor technologies/parameters and outbound (calculated) parameters (This makes obvious the difference between research wearables, which offer raw data acces and consumer wearables which mostly only give access to calculated metrics in outbound) You know its possible for you to maintain your own repository and just pull and merge any new updates I make? Then just set the main reading file to yours. Its just a string you can find in any text editor. I have 500 unique items stuck in pipe. |
|
I have a software deadline to meet on monday, so I am literally working night and day at the moment. After that I will resume and proceed. Regarding the questions about how to organize the data flow and make the connections I will have to come back on that next week. I have not finalized my thoughts on that either. But I think you might be right and its best to have the calculated metrics inbetween the sensor technology (e.g. PPG) and the sensor (e.g. Miband3). Everything that provides Raw data access would have a direct connection to the PPG sensor in addition to connection through calculated metrics. The more data devices are able to calculate from the raw sensor data, the more connections they will have. |
|
Did you view the resulting graph? There are way too many bidirectional arrows. |
New Graph is in the file "Connections_Chris". Old Graph still there
Contain (mostly) everything from the original
Slightly changed logic
Naming changed to better readable Capitalized Naming schema instead of variable like naming scheme. Still Underscores though (like it)
Sensor Technologies added inbetween the vital signs and the tracking device
trackers have inbound sensor technologies/parameters and outbound (calculated) parameters (This makes obvious the difference between research wearables, which offer raw data acces and consumer wearables which mostly only give access to calculated metrics in outbound)
Vital signs and other measurements are more intensely and finegrained interconnected
Graph looks therefore like a mess right now. However this will be fixed once enough tracking devices are added. Right now there are not enough tracking devices in comparison to vital parameters.
Currently not adjusted the weights
Still a lot to add/do! :)