Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make scale_by_mass_matrix! and scale_by_inverse_mass_matrix! public API #278

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

ranocha
Copy link
Owner

@ranocha ranocha commented Jul 18, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.16%. Comparing base (d9d5939) to head (d9c5e13).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #278      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.08%   91.16%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          35       35              
  Lines        5263     5311      +48     
==========================================
+ Hits         4794     4842      +48     
  Misses        469      469              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 91.16% <100.00%> (+0.08%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ranocha ranocha marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2024 12:53
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 91.991% (+0.07%) from 91.925%
when pulling d9c5e13 on hr/scale_by_mass_matrix
into d9d5939 on main.

@ranocha ranocha merged commit 8080cf4 into main Jul 18, 2024
22 checks passed
@ranocha ranocha deleted the hr/scale_by_mass_matrix branch July 18, 2024 12:56
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants