Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarified the expected behaviour for triggerRequest #442

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2018

Conversation

jroper
Copy link
Contributor

@jroper jroper commented Nov 19, 2018

This addresses some of the problem raised in #280.

This addresses some of the problem raised in reactive-streams#280.
* <p>
* Before sending any element to the subscriber, the TCK must wait for the subscriber to request that element, and
* must be prepared for the subscriber to only request one element at a time, it is not enough for the TCK to
* simply invoke this method before sending elements.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Has the following semantics been verified throughout the TCK now? (So that the TCK uses the method appropriately, as described)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jroper Ping :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I believe it has.

@viktorklang viktorklang merged commit 65b95b2 into reactive-streams:master Dec 30, 2018
@viktorklang
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @jroper! 👍

@jroper jroper deleted the clarify-trigger-request branch January 1, 2019 21:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants