Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

coproc: failure in WasmCreateTopicsTest.verify_materialized_topics_test #3858

Closed
ajfabbri opened this issue Feb 18, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@ajfabbri
Copy link
Contributor

Similar to 3745, but in the CreateTopics test...

test_id:    rptest.tests.wasm_topics_test.WasmCreateTopicsTest.verify_materialized_topics_test
--
  | status:     FAIL
  | run time:   48.585 seconds
  |  
  |  
  | Exception('Bad config, expected: [<rptest.clients.rpk.RpkPartition object at 0x7f2611185580>, <rptest.clients.rpk.RpkPartition object at 0x7f26111c7c10>, <rptest.clients.rpk.RpkPartition object at 0x7f26111c7220>] observed: [<rptest.clients.rpk.RpkPartition object at 0x7f261104da60>, <rptest.clients.rpk.RpkPartition object at 0x7f2610f7b040>, <rptest.clients.rpk.RpkPartition object at 0x7f2610f7b190>]')
  | Traceback (most recent call last):
  | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/ducktape/tests/runner_client.py", line 135, in run
  | data = self.run_test()
  | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/ducktape/tests/runner_client.py", line 215, in run_test
  | return self.test_context.function(self.test)
  | File "/root/tests/rptest/services/cluster.py", line 35, in wrapped
  | r = f(self, *args, **kwargs)
  | File "/root/tests/rptest/tests/wasm_topics_test.py", line 51, in verify_materialized_topics_test
  | raise Exception("Bad config, expected: %s observed: %s" %
  | Exception: Bad config, expected: [<rptest.clients.rpk.RpkPartition object at 0x7f2611185580>, <rptest.clients.rpk.RpkPartition object at 0x7f26111c7c10>, <rptest.clients.rpk.RpkPartition object at 0x7f26111c7220>] observed: [<rptest.clients.rpk.RpkPartition object at 0x7f261104da60>, <rptest.clients.rpk.RpkPartition object at 0x7f2610f7b040>, <rptest.clients.rpk.RpkPartition object at 0x7f2610f7b190>]
@ajfabbri ajfabbri added kind/bug Something isn't working ci-failure labels Feb 18, 2022
@ajfabbri
Copy link
Contributor Author

I plan on disabling this shortly--to solidify CI while we work on improvements (see linked issue)

@andrewhsu
Copy link
Member

@ajfabbri
Copy link
Contributor Author

recent failure (from before I just disabled this test): https://buildkite.com/redpanda/redpanda/builds/7506#9608c195-ee9c-4dc3-9ce6-72cfb501db42

daisukebe pushed a commit to daisukebe/redpanda that referenced this issue Mar 4, 2022
@graphcareful graphcareful added the area/wasm WASM Data Transforms label May 2, 2022
@graphcareful
Copy link
Contributor

graphcareful commented May 4, 2022

Going to elaborate why the test failed:

[DEBUG - 2022-02-21 07:50:58,976 - rpk - _execute - lineno:388]: PARTITION  LEADER  REPLICAS  LOG-START-OFFSET  HIGH-WATERMARK
0          2       [1 2 3]   0                 0
1          3       [1 2 3]   0                 10
2          3       [1 2 3]   0                 0

[DEBUG - 2022-02-21 07:50:59,127 - rpk - _execute - lineno:375]: Executing command: ['/var/lib/buildkite-agent/builds/buildkite-amd64-builders-i-0aa53ba031d0daf20-1/redpanda/redpanda/vbuild/debug/clang/dist/local/redpanda/bin/rpk', 'topic', '--brokers', 'docker_n_7:9092,docker_n_17:9092,docker_n_21:9092', 'describe', 'topic-roircxjryu._output_1_', '-p']
[DEBUG - 2022-02-21 07:50:59,196 - rpk - _execute - lineno:388]: PARTITION  LEADER  REPLICAS  LOG-START-OFFSET          HIGH-WATERMARK
0          2       [1 2 3]   0                         0
1          3       [1 2 3]   NOT_LEADER_FOR_PARTITION  10
2          3       [1 2 3]   0                         0

The test is doing a deep comparison and the NOT_LEADER_FOR_PARTITION is causing this to fail.

@dotnwat
Copy link
Member

dotnwat commented Sep 22, 2022

closing this ci-failure ticket. the test is disabled, and there is no scheduled coproc work/maintenance. in the meantime it is polluting the ci-failure clean-up effort statistics.

@dotnwat dotnwat closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 22, 2022
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants