Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rptest: Enable scrubber only if not explicitly disabled #23274

Conversation

nvartolomei
Copy link
Contributor

We want to disable scrubber in a few tests (e.g. specific scale tests, tests without a working cloud storage connection). This worked correctly until we decided to disable it by default but still wanted to keep it enabled in tests
(6a7ff55). I forgot to consider the fact that some tests want it disabled anyway.

Update the code so that scrubber is enabled only if not explicitly disabled.

Backports Required

  • none - not a bug fix
  • none - this is a backport
  • none - issue does not exist in previous branches
  • none - papercut/not impactful enough to backport
  • v24.2.x
  • v24.1.x
  • v23.3.x

Release Notes

  • none

We want to disable scrubber in a few tests (e.g. specific scale tests,
tests without a working cloud storage connection). This worked correctly
until we decided to disable it by default but still wanted to keep it
enabled in tests
(redpanda-data@6a7ff55).
I forgot to consider the fact that some tests want it disabled anyway.

Update the code so that scrubber is enabled only if not explicitly
disabled.
@vbotbuildovich
Copy link
Collaborator

vbotbuildovich commented Sep 11, 2024

@nvartolomei
Copy link
Contributor Author

Unrelated failure gtest_raft_rpunit test timeout. This PR changes only ducktape tests.

@piyushredpanda piyushredpanda merged commit 549aeab into redpanda-data:dev Sep 12, 2024
14 of 17 checks passed
@vbotbuildovich
Copy link
Collaborator

/backport v24.2.x

@vbotbuildovich
Copy link
Collaborator

/backport v24.1.x

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants