fixed invalid next responder check if not found #233
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
A bug exists when indexPathForNextResponderInSectionIndex: on RETableViewCell.m if the sections do not match. If not, the value is set to -1. The for loop below automaticall adds 1 to the unsigned -1, which makes it 0. Thus, the for loop condition was met when it shouldn't have been. By setting it to -2 then subtracting the number of items in the section, the for loop conidition will never be met when the section is not equal.
|
@adrum please make your branch up to date with |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A bug exists when indexPathForNextResponderInSectionIndex: on RETableViewCell.m if the sections do not match. If not, the value is set to -1. The for loop below automaticall adds 1 to the unsigned -1, which makes it 0. Thus, the for loop condition was met when it shouldn't have been.
By setting it to -2 then subtracting the number of items in the section, the for loop conidition will never be met when the section is not equal.