fix(rome_js_formatter): abstract must precede accessor

[Conaclos]

Summary

While I was updating prettier snapshots in #4234, cargo test failed on a mis-formatted code.

The following code:

abstract class C { abstract accessor prop: number }

was formatted at the following syntactically invalid code:

abstract class C { accessor abstract prop: number }
                            ^^^^^^^^
                            'abstarct' must precede 'accessor'

This PR fixes this issue.
In the future, code could be refactored in order to use the enum that encodes modifier precedence in the parser.

Note: By the way, I am not sure to understand why the formatter tries to fix the modifier order if the parser errors as soon as a mis-ordered modifier is found.

Test Plan

I included a test for the formatter.

Documentation

No change.

• The PR requires documentation
• I will create a new PR to update the documentation

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for docs-rometools ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	6e8c973
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-rometools/deploys/63ff3bf266527100085dc30c
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-4242--docs-rometools.netlify.app/playground
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

[denbezrukov]

By the way, I am not sure to understand why the formatter tries to fix the modifier order if the parser errors as soon as a mis-ordered modifier is found.

I think because we need to cover this case:
https://docs.rome.tools/playground/?code=YwBsAGEAcwBzACAAVABlAHMAdAAgAHsACgAgACAAIAAgAGQAZQBjAGwAYQByAGUAIABwAHIAaQB2AGEAdABlACAAcgBlAGEAZABvAG4AbAB5ACAAdABlAHMAdAA%2FADoAIABzAHQAcgBpAG4AZwA7AAoAfQA%3D