Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cop out on fixing a spurious test failure #5488

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 5, 2018
Merged

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This commit cops out trying to fix rename_with_link_search_path by simply
adding a loop on Windows to retry the operation that looks to need retrying.

This commit cops out trying to fix `rename_with_link_search_path` by simply
adding a loop on Windows to retry the operation that looks to need retrying.
@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @matklad

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@matklad
Copy link
Member

matklad commented May 5, 2018

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 5, 2018

📌 Commit 1759b30 has been approved by matklad

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 5, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 1759b30 with merge 0f9df98...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2018
Cop out on fixing a spurious test failure

This commit cops out trying to fix `rename_with_link_search_path` by simply
adding a loop on Windows to retry the operation that looks to need retrying.
@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented May 5, 2018

Just FYI, I put this through a stress test on AppVeyor (here) and it seems to pass just fine (with some warnings)! 🎉

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

Awesome, thanks @ehuss! Hopefully we don't have to put this logic in too many places...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 5, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: matklad
Pushing 0f9df98 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 1759b30 into rust-lang:master May 5, 2018
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the Retry branch May 10, 2018 19:17
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.27.0 milestone Feb 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants