Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Let update_lints also generate the internal lints #5156

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 15, 2020

Conversation

flip1995
Copy link
Member

r? @phansch

changelog: none

@flip1995 flip1995 added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Feb 11, 2020
@flip1995 flip1995 mentioned this pull request Feb 11, 2020
6 tasks
@phansch phansch self-requested a review February 11, 2020 11:01
Copy link
Member

@phansch phansch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe when I first implemented this, I had concerns about internal lints showing up in user facing stuff. But since we have fn usable_lints now, I don't think that's a problem anymore, if we use it correctly.

LGTM 👍

clippy_dev/src/main.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@flip1995
Copy link
Member Author

I had concerns about internal lints showing up in user facing stuff.

With the explicit .chain(internal_lints) (like it is done somewhere with deprecated lints), this only affects the stuff in clippy_lints/src/lib.rs

@flip1995
Copy link
Member Author

r? @phansch

@phansch
Copy link
Member

phansch commented Feb 15, 2020

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 15, 2020

📌 Commit 50a2f97 has been approved by phansch

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 15, 2020

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened

@flip1995
Copy link
Member Author

@bors treeclosed-

oops forgot to reopen the tree after doc update.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 15, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 50a2f97 with merge 933a0a9...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2020
Let update_lints also generate the internal lints

r? @phansch

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 15, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: phansch
Pushing 933a0a9 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 50a2f97 into rust-lang:master Feb 15, 2020
@flip1995 flip1995 deleted the dev_add_internal branch February 15, 2020 11:01
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2020
…logiq,flip1995

I like to move it, move it

GHA now runs in the background for 6 days (#5088)

Since then ~~15~~ 19 PRs were successfully merged and Travis+Appveyor agreed on the status in every case. ([GitHub PR search query](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr+is%3Amerged+merged%3A%3E%3D2020-02-12T15%3A42%3A00+sort%3Aupdated-desc+NOT+%5Bgh-pages%5D+in%3Atitle))

Some PRs were:
- #5163
- #5170
- #5168
- #5173
- #5171
- #5156
- #4809
- #5177
- #5182
- #5183
- #5184
- #5185
- #5186
- #5181
- #5189

Bug with GHA:
- When a rustc PR gets merged between the `integration_build` and the `integration` job, the `integration` job will fail. This happened once in #5162, but not in the past 6 days. Even if it would happen every 4th PR we would save time, since splitting up the integration build and tests saves 5-7 minutes per run and a complete run takes 15-17 minutes
- Sometimes the MacOS build takes up to an hour to download the master toolchain. Until now, this happend 2 or 3 times and can be resolved by a `@bors r3try`+canceling the previous run (restarting single jobs is not supported yet)

## Before merging this, rust-lang/rust-central-station#578 has to get merged

This PR is for starting the discussion and to get consensus (@rust-lang/clippy) on a final move to GHA. If we're ready, I'll contact Pietro, to finalize the move.

changelog: Clippy completely runs on GHA now 🎉

---

BTW: The deployment already runs on GHA, instead of Travis.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants