Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustdoc: remove unused mobile CSS .rustdoc { flex-direction } #101534

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2022

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

According to MDN, flex-direction only applies to flex containers, which are boxes with display: flex or inline-flex.

However, the .rustdoc body container is not a flex-container on mobile. A few lines above, it's set to display: block, so this selector does not have any effect.

According to MDN, [flex-direction] only applies to [flex containers], which
are boxes with `display: flex` or `inline-flex`.

However, the `.rustdoc` body container is not a flex-container on mobile.
A few lines above, it's set to `display: block`, so this selector does
not have any effect.

[flex-direction]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/flex-direction

[flex containers]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_Flexible_Box_Layout/Basic_Concepts_of_Flexbox#the_flex_container
@rustbot rustbot added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 7, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @jsha

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 7, 2022

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez, @Folyd, @jsha

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 7, 2022
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 7, 2022

📌 Commit 210c851 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 7, 2022

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 7, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#101343 (Add -api-level to pm command)
 - rust-lang#101416 (stdio: Document no support for writing to non-blocking stdio/stderr)
 - rust-lang#101435 (Remove unnecessary `EMIT_MIR_FOR_EACH_BITWIDTH`)
 - rust-lang#101493 (Pass ImplTraitContext as &mut to avoid the need of ImplTraitContext::reborrow)
 - rust-lang#101502 (Do not suggest a semicolon for a macro without `!`)
 - rust-lang#101503 (Add debug calls)
 - rust-lang#101506 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `#main-content > .since`)
 - rust-lang#101507 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `#main-content > table td`)
 - rust-lang#101521 (Rustdoc-Json: More accurate struct type.)
 - rust-lang#101525 (Fix typo in pass_manager.rs)
 - rust-lang#101534 (rustdoc: remove unused mobile CSS `.rustdoc { flex-direction }`)
 - rust-lang#101535 (Fix error printing mistake in tidy)
 - rust-lang#101536 (Add documentation for Attr::is_doc_comment)
 - rust-lang#101538 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `.content .methods > div`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 09e7bb4 into master Sep 7, 2022
@bors bors deleted the notriddle/rustdoc-flex-direction branch September 7, 2022 23:40
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Sep 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants