Do not filter substs in remap_generic_params_to_declaration_params.

[cjgillot]

The relevant filtering should have been performed by borrowck.

Fixes #105826

r? types

[lcnr]

don't have the context to quickly review this.

r? oli-obk with the hope that it's easier to review for them

[oli-obk]

Ah wonderful... I was hoping we could nuke this hack. Your variance PR would resolve this issue correctly, so 👍

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit ebd22bf has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[Noratrieb]

Tests moved from src/tests to the tests directory in the root, can you rebase and move them?
@bors r-
@rustbot author

[apiraino]

Beta backport approved as per compiler team on Zulip

@rustbot label +beta-accepted

[compiler-errors]

@bors r=oli-obk p=1

[bors]

📌 Commit b7bb8a5 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit b7bb8a5 with merge 7bdc564531393b89f559ff9ac2db865aa30370de...

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[compiler-errors]

Spurious rustdoc failure

@bors retry

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit b7bb8a5 with merge 6d46b1e...

[rust-log-analyzer]

The job x86_64-apple-2 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

Some tests failed in compiletest suite=rustdoc mode=rustdoc host=x86_64-apple-darwin target=x86_64-apple-darwin

failures:

---- [rustdoc] rust/tests/rustdoc/primitive/no_std.rs stdout ----
thread '[rustdoc] rust/tests/rustdoc/primitive/no_std.rs' panicked at 'called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Os { code: 22, kind: InvalidInput, message: "Invalid argument" }', src/tools/compiletest/src/runtest.rs:2352:34


failures:
    [rustdoc] rust/tests/rustdoc/primitive/no_std.rs

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing 6d46b1e to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (6d46b1e): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.6%	[0.6%, 0.6%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-4.8%	[-4.8%, -4.8%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.1%	[-4.8%, 0.6%]	2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.