[breaking-batch] Simplify ast::StructField #32682
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r=me, on hold for more changes to batch up |
|
We'll batch with the fix for #32655 when it lands. |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #32688) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
Rebased. ping @Manishearth, another breaking change (#32688) has just landed. |
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 6, 2016
The AST part of rust-lang#31937 Unlike HIR, AST still uses `Option` for field names because parser can't know field indexes reliably due to constructions like ``` struct S(#[cfg(false)] u8, u8); // The index of the second field changes from 1 during parsing to 0 after expansion. ``` and I wouldn't like to put the burden of renaming fields on expansion passes and syntax extensions. plugin-[breaking-change] cc rust-lang#31645 r? @Manishearth
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The AST part of #31937
Unlike HIR, AST still uses
Optionfor field names because parser can't know field indexes reliably due to constructions likeand I wouldn't like to put the burden of renaming fields on expansion passes and syntax extensions.
plugin-[breaking-change] cc #31645
r? @Manishearth